What is Harold Camping's current eschatology?

I must admit that Harold Camping’s arguments are bizarre. Can anyone explain his current date system and what (spiritually) happened on each date? I think his teachings refer to 1988, 1994 as being significant, and of course, the “spiritual” May 21, and the final day of Oct 21, which he apparently thinks (why?) is not going to be spiritual.

Can anyone explain his doctrine in a nutshell?

I would say take the word “nutshell” and split it in half. Pick a half.

Seriously: here’s a link to a breakdown of some of his math.

To which I add:

Basically, if I remember his press conference of the other day, he said that, in 1988, God withdrew any sort of blessings from the churches and turned them over to Satan, making it impossible for anyone who is a member of a church to go to heaven. I forget what supposedly happened in 1994. On May 21, God judged mankind, and that was the last chance for anyone living now to be saved. As of May 21, you’re either going to heaven or you’re not. On October 21, there’ll be a big earthquake and the world will come to an end, at which point, those who will go to heaven will, and those who won’t won’t.

1994, eh? It was probably Clinton’s fault.

Nonsense! It was leftover angst from the Republicans!

(Always blame the previous administration.)

So what will he say on Oct. 22?

What I would really like to know is how much money he is extracting from his followers.

It was a spiritual end of the world.:smiley:

I would say that it’s more of a scatological question at this point.

The “hell” part, or the “nuts”?

Yeah, yeah, you probably meant by syllables, but this way works, too.

About $2-$3 million per month. Annual revenue of $12 million to $18 million, with assets of between $72 million to over $100 million.

This is over the last 3 years or so. It may be somewhat less now. (Though we may not be able to count on that. People who believe preachers like him tend to be real gullible about believing excuses, too.)

No, that’s exactly what I meant. When Harold Camping et al. talk hell, all I hear is nuts.

The OP: I came across the answer to this at religioustolerance.org. Fasten your seatbelt, this will be a rough ride. Camping provides 3 arguments. Here’ number 1:

Got all that? The 2nd argument is that Camping thinks last Saturday was the 7000 year anniversary of Noah’s Flood, which he dates to 4990 BC.

Point 3: Last Saturday was the end of a 33 year tribulation during which Satan has ruled over the churches.

Video at the link! Which I haven’t viewed! http://www.religioustolerance.org/hcamping.htm

Well … no. He seems to have missed a few factors:

Like the calendar adjustments of the last 20 centuries.

  • The Julian calendar was not quite accurate, so the Romans adjusted it at times.
  • Then the big adjustment when switching to the Gregorian calendar – that involved dropping several days.
  • Then in modern times, to account for rocket launches, thee have been several changes (though pretty minor, only on the order of a few seconds).

Not that I think correcting for these would matter in the end.

So… he’s based his entire career on this?

“this monkey’s gone to heaven”

Man, I’ve GOT to come up with a good hook to start a Church!

It worked for L. Ron Hubbard.

This, from a site that is critical about Camping, but not critical about the bible. Apparently the possibility that the Rapture is impossible fiction written by ignorant scribes 2000 years ago isn’t one they will consider. You just got the date wrong, bub.

Actually, the Rapture is an interpretation of the Bible that was reinvigorated in the 1830s. The Ancient Christians (c. 431) thought the doctrine was heretical. Cite.

I think that’s wrong. I’m looking at the Councils of Ephesus, and I can’t find an outright condemnation of it as heresy. Do you have any more information? As far as I can tell, the first one condemned the Nestorians and Euchites, the second condemned Monophysitism, and the third condemned the Council of Chalcedon (which had condemned the second).