http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mpetcats.html
“given how little practical purpose most of them serve) as cats and dogs”
I have to refute the context of this… Most urban dwellers probably own animals for the sheer companionship of them (as myself), but many that I’m aquianted with own them soley for their practical purposes.
Take dogs for example… Many people own them for hunting ability alone. They are able to retreive down birds, point to nested birds, flush sitting birds, and trail or tree small game. Hunting in any of these aspects would not be likely without the assitance of canines, and is often diffucult or unsuccessful without their aid, if not impossible without their perceptive nose. While you may see hunting as “non-practical”, it’s a daily occurance for quite a few people, and is the sole reason for owning dogs amongst most of them.
Additionally, dogs can be trained to defend their territory for security purposes, and are also a tremendous asset to the disabled in countless ways.
Cats as well serve a practical purpose as natural rodent control, in addition to the aforementioned companionship (which I deem as ‘practical’, multiple millions of pet lovers will second this).
There never has been a better mouse trap such as the cat. If you’d take the time to frequent just about any small farm (try it sometime, it’s nice to know where your food comes from if nothing else), you’ll find the occurance of “farm cats”, which are more or less unkempt cats that any farmer welcomes as a natural predator to rats, birds, mice, and other farm dwelling pests that can damage, devastate, or soil any number of crops/feed/milk.
Indeed, MANY domesticated animals DO serve a “practical purpose” and are still kept for that sole reason, albeit not in Central Park.
So, point in case, please clarify on “practical” or cite your references in the future, becuase many domesicated animals are bred, bought, cared for, or allowed to exist for “practical” purposes which humans alone cannot acheive without their assistance…