What is it with men and sexual abuse of children?

Yes, I have. And I quote myself:

“We could start with some simple things, such as no longer allowing male coaches, male teachers (etc) to be alone with our children. If the kids’ activities involve sleepovers, there should be sufficient female chaperones. Don’t allow children to visit the “nice old couple down the street” without supervision. And mothers need to be a hell of a lot more vigilant than they are now. Especially about what goes on in her own home.”

We’ve covered this topic of female abusers. It’s a known fact that men far outnumber women in the sexual abuse department.

What I find hard to believe is that you think anyone here (especially by now) cares what you find hard to believe.

LadyMadonna - What percentage of men, in your estimation, are potential abusers? Just a guess will do.

And where are you going to find all these women to supervise? And how are you going to pay them?

"It’s a known fact that men far outnumber women in the sexual abuse department. " - Lady Madonna
Well, just to throw some of your own bad medicine back at ya, (paraphrasing some of your earlier posts): how can we trust the statistics? And how do we know that all those women aren’t *thinking about *molesting children?

My wife’s mother is like you.

She has totaly fucked up the life of her two daughters. They can’t hold a job or any serious relationhip, not just with men. They are touroughly afraid of the outside world.

You are a very dangerous person and I think you should be prevented from having contact with children.

You’re an idiot for even posing this question. It’s considered abuse because we are HUMAN. Sexual abuse causes toxic damage to a person’s psyche.

And I never said that the VAST MAJORITY of men want to abuse children. I said that the vast majority of the perpetrators are male. The problem is that we don’t know which men will offend, and which ones won’t.

And how do we know that sexual abuse by women isn’t vastly underreported vis a vis by men?

100%. Just being a man will be enough to be an abuser. I once saw a male teacher actually look at a 13 year old girl once… disgraceful!

What’s rude is your stupid fucking ideas and not having the damn sense to keep them and yourself away from the rest of the world. Go back to eating your own shit while you masturbate feriously to your thoughts of men raping little kids.

So treat us all as if we were convicted…

Color me surprised. I never knew that the vast majority of abusers being male necessarily and logically meant that the vast majority of males were abusers.

Okay, I’m done with this. Most people recognize that child sexual abuse is a serious problem. But too many posters on this thread are more driven to amuse others (and themselves) with their creative banter, than to address possible resolutions.

Hope you all have a good week, and hope your children stay safe.

Don’t let the door hit you in the ass.

Substitute “brown” or “black” for “man”, and we come around to racial profiling. I’m sure we all know how effective that’s been proven to be.

You’re missing her point. It’s not that “that the vast majority of males were abusers,” it is “that the vast majority of males must be treated as abusers” despite their personal thoughts or actions. And maybe a shock collar can be used to free up some of the women’s supervisory time.

We do recognize abuse as a serious issue. We do recognize placing all men on restricticve probation as a solution.

Really? Which humans are You talking about? Women? Or that 0% of men?

I’m going to assume the bolded part should have a NOT somewhere in it.

As long as they are girls. The boys are all psychopathic predators anyway, right? No reason to care about them, they’re probably raping their sisters when you aren’t looking.