[QUOTE=the raindog]
The bolding is mine.
Show me.
Given that you have an interest in this, it should be easy. While you’re at it, show me the “clunky and ugly” parts, and their more elegant counterparts.
Show me.
[/QUOTE]
Well, actually, I don’t have an interest in this. I’ve made that plain in both of my responses to you so far. One of the best things about walking away from Christianity is not having a rooting interest in arguments like these.
But, let’s take a look at one example. How about John 1:1? This will be me going from memory since I no longer own copies of New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures, The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures, or even a King James Bible.
KJV: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
NWTotHS: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.
Small difference in the wording, huge difference in the meaning. So which is right? Well, in the original Greek, there’s no article before the final theos (god). That would make the most appropriate translation “and the Word was God.”
You could construe it to mean that there should be an implied indefinite article in there, but that isn’t the simplest or most straightforward translation. And if the Jehovah’s Witness translations are known for one thing, it’s for being very word-for-word literal. So why not here? In my opinion, it’s because the KJV translation (which is the same in the Reina-Valera Spanish translation, the bible of my missionary years, as well as every other translation I’ve seen) seems to support a belief in the Trinity. Jehovah’s Witnesses reject the Trinity (not saying they’re wrong or right); how convenient then that their translation starts interjecting implied articles in an otherwise very clear and straightforward passage of Greek.
As far as the “clunky and ugly” goes, it’s strictly my opinion. To me, reading the Psalms in the KJV feels like reading poetry, and in the NWTotHS it feels like reading the instruction manual for a VCR. The language is just very plain, modern and feels pedantic to me.
There are good things about the New World Translation: for one, I like how they cut out the LORD and GOD euphemisms for the name of Jehovah. Now, how they pronounce that name is another matter entirely, but hey, this isn’t Great Debates. 