I saw the*** Federalist ***piece that seems to have sparked this.
Is it a big deal? No, of course not. But it appears Neil DeGrassie Tyson is doing something that MANY popular speakers do: taking urban legends or dubious quotes as gospel, and building a theme around them.
LOTS of people of every ideology do this. Decades ago, Ronald Reagan’s stump speeches regularly entailed humorous anecdotes about liberal Democrats, or second-hand stories about, say, women on welfare driving Cadillacs. Were such anecdotes true? Sometimes, they were 100% true. Other times, they were based on truth, but drastically oversimplified. Sometimes, Reagan was merely rehashing a bit he’d seen in ***Reader’s Digest ***that was just an urban legend.
As I said, LOTS of speakers hear a great story or a funny quote and think, “This is great, I just HAVE to use this,” but never check too closely whetehr the story is true or whether the person the quote is attributed to actually said it.
I myself have attributed quotes to Mark Twain or Abe Lincoln or Groucho Marx that they probably didn’t really say. In my mind, Tyson is guilty of nothing more serious than that. It’s a minor peccadillo, not a huge crime.
I’d be a LITTLE more angry if Tyson had attributed a stupid quote directly to a specific politician. That is, if Tyson had claimed “President George W. Bush was outraged that half of all doctors graduated in the bottom half of their class in medical school,” that would be grossly unfair. But if he attributed such a silly quote to SOME nameless politician, I can’t really see the harm.
So long as Tyson is just using a few humorous anecdotes or silly quotes to illustrate a general point, rather than to mock a particular person, it’s fine by me.