When I was a sophomore in high school, I was taught that hyperbole is the word for both overstatement and understatement for effect. Since I’ve gotten out of high school, no one has ever used “hyperbole” to mean understatement, only overstatement.
So, was my high school English teacher correct about the meaning of hyperbole, or is the rest of the world? Given that I expect it’s the rest of the world, is there an equivalent word for “understatement for effect”?
From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 :
Hyperbole \Hyper"boLe, n. [L., fr. Gr?, prop., an
overshooting, excess, fr. Gr. ? to throw over or beyond;
"yep`r over + ? to throw. See Hyper-, Parable, and cf.
Hyperbola.] (Rheta.)
A figure of speech in which the expression is an evident
exaggeration of the meaning intended to be conveyed, or by
which things are represented as much greater or less, better
or worse, than they really are; a statement exaggerated
fancifully, through excitement, or for effect.
[1913 Webster]
By that definition, some things can be hyperbole when exaggeratedly less than normal.
“Silent Cal never said three words together.”
Both. Like sheep, litotes is both singular and plural. Technically, it’s the name of a single technique, so you would not have two or three litotes in an essay, but two or three instances of [the use of] litotes.
I’ve only once heard “litotes” used in conversation. As I recall, the person pronounced it as: lie-tote-eeze, with the stress on the 2nd syllable. Is that correct?
This is all really interesting, and I appreciate it. I’m glad to know that hyperbole may, in fact, be about both under- and overstatement and I’m glad to have learned a whole bunch of new words.
I’ll be extra glad when I can find away to use “meiosis” in a gramatically correct fashion with a fellow biologist, though.
I disagree with the OP’s teacher. I suspect that the teacher was confusing understatement with overstatement of a negative characteristic. If one is suggesting that a thing has little of a particular characteristic, it is hyperbole to say that it has even less of that characteristic.
What isn’t hyperbole is to represent that a thing has less of a characteristic in order to emphasise that the thing has more of it, which is the essence of understatement for effect.
The essence is of hyperbole is exaggeration. Indeed if one reads through the various definitions given given here one can see that hyperbole and exaggeration are essentially synonymous. Note that several sources on that page give “understatement” as the antonym of hyperbole.
To continue with the example given by According to Pliny, “Silent Cal never said three words together” is overstatement, not understatement. It is not an understatement of his taciturnity, it is an overstatement of it. An understatement of his taciturnity would be “Silent Cal talks maybe just a little less than most people”
My understanding of litotes was that it referred only to that horrible rhetorical device of emphasising something by saying it isn’t its opposite. Like “He isn’t the worst guitarist I have ever heard,” meaning, rather, that he is the best.