The first thing that came to my mind was the Tunguska “fireball” incident but I have no idea wether ir not it has anything to do with this peculiar crater.
If the Wikipedia entry on Tunguska is correct, this is not it. According to the Wikipedia article, the location for the Tunguska event was 60°55′ N 101°57′ E.
Also, there’s nothing at this location listed in the Earth Impact Database, leading me to suspect that it formed from below, rather than from an impact from space.
IANA Vulcanologist, but it looks to me like a caldera, which is the result of the cone of a volcano collapsing on itself. The best-known example of this in the US is Crater Lake, Oregon, in which the caldera has filled with water to form the lake. A Google Earth aerial view is here.
The caldera (if that’s what it is) in the OP’s link is about half-way between the city of Yakutsk in Siberia and the coast of the Sea of Okhotsk (which, as mhendo pointed out, is a fair way from the Tunguska event, as can be sen on the map here).
The OP’s caldera looks like it might have a resurgent dome in the middle, with lava flows which joined and exited the caldera on the north side.
The Kamchatka peninsula, east of the Sea of Okhotsk, has many active volcanoes, and you can see another caldera here.
Since the OP has been answered, I venture to hijack this thread. I copied the coordinates posted in the OP and pasted them into Google Earth, and it actually got me to the crater this thread was about, at 57.599439° North, 134.634018° East. How? The coordinates given were just a string of numbers without any designations about W/E longitude and N/S latitude. Is there a universal conventions that latitudes and longitudes without designations are to be interpreted as North and East by default?
Sorry to be so late oming in here, but I have another question. Doesn’t Google Maps handle DMS notation (like"60°55′ N 101°57′ E")? Certainly I can convert minutes to the fraction, and using +/- for directions is no problem, but cut-and-paste is much handier.