what the fuck?? [guy whose "favorite" videos involve VERY young girls]

So I’m perusing you tube, watching a video of a place I was stationed at in the Army many years ago. I click one of the posters names to see if i knew him way back when.

His “favorite” videos are VERY young girls. VERY young. While not considered porn, it is a bit disturbing that You Tube allows this.

Am I overreacting? Or is this guy the piece of shit I think he is?

Here is his you tube name and address.

I removed the link from the OP because it linked to personal information.

Gfactor
Pit Moderator

sorry!

These couldn’t by any chance be innocent home movies of his daughters, could they?

That was my first thought. Or nieces, or god-daughters, or friends’ children.

Without a more specific description of the content, it’s impossible to form an opinion. How young exactly? What are they doing? How are they dressed? What kind of context does it have?

Gestating?

But don’t you see?

They’re “VERY young girls. VERY young.”

That should be enough! Goddammit, get ANGRY! Hurt somebody! What’re you waiting for? Are you saying that you’re OKAY with this?!? You MUST be. There can’t be any other
explanation for your hesitation…

Serious, now: " While not considered porn,"

Really? Then what’s your problem with it? My sister gave birth four years ago to her only children. She’s photographed them countless times, and they’re still only four years old.

OMG!!! THEY CAN’T GIVE INFORMED CONSENT!!!1!eleven!

Am I overreacting, or is she the piece of shit that I think she is?

(Clue for the Clueless: I don’t think she’s a piece of shit. I think she’s a proud parent. God, I’m in such denial!)

Yes, it is a cute video but look at some of the posts.

Interesting. We’ve gone from “anyone who sees children as sex objects is weird and wrong” to “children are sex objects, that’s the only reason anyone would look at them”…

I’d hit it… if “it” was 15 years older.
Anyway, youtube posts aren’t indicative of anything except that many people who write youtube posts are idiots.

Yeah, the posts are kind of nasty, but hey, I bet those people are now on some DHS registry somewhere.

Won’t somebody think of the VERY young girls???

That’s what some people are being accused of.

Don’t forget the boys!! (Check out the collection of the person who posted this video. He certainly enjoys the talents of boys of a certain age. He’s even got … wait for it… a young Michael Jackson. But really, what can you do?)

Pretty much. The paranoia is so rife that as a man I’m basically terrified of interacting with children in any way, for any reason lest I be immediately suspected of being some kind of sick, sick pervert. I don’t look at them, don’t talk to them, and sure as hell don’t touch them, no matter how innocuously. It’s sort of a sad state of affairs, but that’s the way society wants it.

It’s obvious that any adult who interacts with small children IS a sick, sick pervert. I myself would throw in another ‘sick’. BTW, I include parents and teachers. First of all, the parents had to have SEX to get the children, and we all know what a perversion that is. And teachers? Well, you don’t think they’re in the classroom to TEACH, do you?

And those doctors that do the deliveries, trying to get first dibs on putting their claws in their blank minds and new untainted bodies! It’s a fucking disgrace, that’s what it is.

Does this mean we have to keep the VERY young biy videos away from the Micheal Jackson video? Won’t someone think of the VERY young boy videos?!?!

The linked video is of what looks like about a 6 year old dancing in her underwear. Maybe that’s an innocent video for parents or close family to look at, but I have a hard time finding a non-creepy reason that someone would collect these kinds of videos as his favorites if he has no personal connection to the kids. The OP is not being paranoid here. I don’t think it’s anything that youtube can or should do anything about, but it’s perfectly reasonable to be creeped out by the guy who’s stockpiling stuff like this in his favorites list.