I’ll try to clarify. My statement before this was that the “respect” explanation actually derives from a class-based system. As further evidence, I was saying those who use it tend to still use it as a way to look down on their “inferiors” based on how they dress.
So, while they may not adhere to the earlier system, they are essentially still classist. It’s still about looking down on others, rather than actually being about avoiding disrespect.
I don’t know anyone who has expressed a “you’re dressed like a peasant” mentality. I’ve heard slut, stoner, hippie, punk, nerd, millenial, etc. All derogative, but not what comes to mind when I think of classism.
However I’m pretty sure LSLGuy was implying the sentence should read like this:
I have only ever heard the “respect” explanation from anyone who doesn’t looks down on people who dress differently than them.
I wouldn’t think so. Unless you’re a pilot and the Pilot of the plane has a heart attack. Then I’ll bet no one cares what you’re wearing.
All in all, it pays to dress for the occasion if you’re able.
Flying on a commercial flight seems to beg for comfort. IMO.
It’s bad enough without it. If you’re lucky enough to fly first class hopefully you won’t be in there with a rock band or a rapper who doesn’t have their own jet yet. Or some rich lady with a bunch of frou frou perfumery and two Pekinese puppies.
I usually dress decently for flights because I think it might make it slightly easier to sail through security, passport control and customs. To me, it’s not about showing respect, it’s about not drawing the attention of assholes in uniform who can ruin my day.
On another topic (which I don’t think has come up here for consideration yet), fedman1 has decided to champion the cause of all the poor guys who get falsely blamed for rape, clearly demonstrating who he thinks the real victims of rape are.