Thanks, jar. That makes sense. And I’m certainly not one of those people who pooh-poohs clinical depression as something that can be cured by determination and a day at the spa.
The reason I’m asking, I guess, is that while my (aforementioned) friend is planning to take the meds for the rest of her life, she gets crap from a therapist friend of hers about how therapy (in which she is currently not involved) could help her forego the meds. Bullshit, says she.
But I know another person (though not well) who suffers from some sort of anxiety disorder that got so bad that she didn’t leave her apartment for a year. Eventually, she got treatment (including medication) and got better. However, when she got married and decided to have a child, she busted her ass to function without the medication, because she didn’t want to have it in her system during her pregnancy.
And I know yet a third person who is off and on medication for anxiety, but does make it a goal to function without it whenever possible.
Different illnesses, I know, but I’m wondering if you’re somehow made to feel, when you get your diagnosis, that your goal should be to become less dependent on medication, or what? I mean, for example, some people with low-grade diabetes (to use your example) are told by their docs that they should try to control it via their diet, so that medication won’t be necessary. So is it like that with some bi-polar diagnoses, does it depend on the physician’s particular theories, or what?
I hope I’m not being intrusive; I’m just curious.