A more serious response to the OP:
[I Am Not An Historian, so all of the following is As Far As I Know, and As I Understand It, and I could be wrong.]
George Washington was, initially, actually not that great a general. He made a lot of tactical and operational mistakes. But, and this is critical, he learned from his mistakes, and improved his performance as the war went on.
“It takes 15,000 casualties to train a major general.”
- Ferdinand Foch
But beyond that, as discussed upthread, he had an excellent strategic vision. Many of his contemporaries were thinking in terms of defeating the British Army in detail on the battlefield. Washington was thinking in terms of avoiding being defeated in detail on the battlefield by the British Army. He correctly realized that the Colonies’ only real hope of victory was to maintain the Continental Army as a cohesive fighting force that was capable of credibly threatening the British Army, an army-in-being. And he managed that strategic task brilliantly, and at times seemingly by sheer force of will.
As also discussed upthread, it was after the defeat of the British that George Washington had what was probably his finest moment. A group of officers were upset over back-pay they were owed, and were plotting mutiny. Some of them probably just wanted to extort payment by threat of force, but others seemed to want an actual coup against the Continental Congress. At that point, Washington could have done what so many generals before and since have done. He could have harnessed those officers to install himself as a military strongman. Or just stood aside and let himself be used as a figurehead for an armed mutiny.
Instead, Washington addressed the disgruntled officers, and talked them down. He defused the situation, convinced the officers to lay down their arms, disband, and go home, and lead the way by example.
“Gentlemen, you will permit me to put on my spectacles, for I have not only grown gray but almost blind in the service of my country.”
- George Washington, addressing members of the “Newburgh Conspiracy”
After that, when it became clear that the Articles of Confederation were dysfunctional, and a new Constitutional Convention was called, George Washington was the consensus pick to preside. He doesn’t seem to have been a particularly active presiding officer. But what he did do was vital. Despite being a pretty literal embodiment of the Virginia planter aristocracy, he was widely viewed by the members of the convention from all sections of the country as a fair and capable presiding officer. And there were a lot of deep-seated and highly contentious sectional conflicts in the new country. And a lot of big egos representing those sections. George Washington was probably the only person in the country who both had the stature to wrangle all of those egos and the perceived equanimity and fairness to convince them that their sectional interests were being duly considered.
And then he was elected the first President of the United States.