Seriously, what gives? Are people just insecure, whiny, ignorant asses?
This is not in response to any thread in particular. I have only gotten a few posts into any thread railing on him, because they all seem to lack merit. I’ve grown tired of people lashing out for no good reason, at a person whom I think is pretty respectable.
I’m not sure about his beliefs (I never go into GD because debate angers the blood), but I’m sure we may differ on a few topics. However, this does not make him an unreasonable person (unless he’s a creationist, in which case have fun).
tomndebb is rational and tactful, almost to a fault IMO. I think he could tell me that he had to kill my parents, and after having explained himself, I would understand.
I fully expect to be “torn to shreds” by the people that have an issue with him, but I don’t really care. I’m just genuinely curious as to why someone might have a serious problem with him.
To answer a few of the first questions preemptively:
No, I have no reason to kiss his ass, nor do I think I am doing so.
No, I will not kindly fuck myself.
No, I will not read 30 pages of inane banter in order to understand what you mean. Summarize.
No, I do not own a zither.
Yes, I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
I don’t know. I guess that just by being a Mod, it’s inevitable that he’s going to make some decisions which displease people. Personally, I think he’s long been one of the sanest, most patient and reasonable posters on the board, as well as having a good level of base knowledge on the topics he shows the most interest in talking about. I’ve never had any issues with the guy even when he’s used his Mod stick on me. I think he’s a good contributor as a poster and a fair moderator.
One thing I’ve noticed about him is that he almost never uses profanity. That’s pretty unusual for this board.
Creationist usually want to teach their crap in Schools. The delightful myth of Jesus rising from the dead does nothing more to hurt science education that learning about Baldur.
Once in GD, Nutters can be polite, engaging and interesting to debate with, but more frequently soon turn into poo-flinging howler monkeys. At this point Tom, being a GD mod, steps in and tells them to knock it off.
The Nutter, being a Nutter, blows a fuse at this and we get yet another anti-Tom thread.
It may seem like there’s more Tomhate in the last month or two since the current Nutter and his waterboy have been particularly prolific posters who deliberately try to dance on the line between ‘judgment call’ and ‘automatic banning’.
See, this is why people seem to have a problem with you. If someone makes a joke and religion is mentioned even in passing you just latch on and don’t let go.
Jim, I can’t believe you took the bait.
Nah, I do not mind, if he does not see a difference between teaching mythology as Science and Mythology as Mythology, than he is a bigger idiot than I thought he was. I think it is better for someone non-religious to answer his BS questions. It keeps the Bible out of the conversation.
So what? What harm does this cause you or anyone else? Any student that chooses may abstain from the pledge. What does this have to do with your first question anyway. Changing the subject when you are stumped is weak.