I was looking for some ground beef at the store and 90% of it was 80/20 (20% fat). That’s good - makes good juicy burgers. I was looking for something leaner and picked up a differently labelled package expecting 90/10 or 93/7. Instead it was 70/30! What the hell do you want with ground meat that is well over a quarter fat?
Unless you’re trying to duplicate Taco Bell filling.
Oh, absolutely for hamburgers! I buy 73-27 (don’t know why those numbers) or 80-20 for hamburgers. Otherwise, you can always cook it down and pour off the fat for any number of ground beef recipes (like spaghetti sauce and things of that nature.) But it makes for a wonderfully juice burger. Serious Eats estimates an In N Out patty to be 60-40 (!) Fatty burgers are where it’s at!
70/30 or 73/27 are standard around here for low-price grocery stores. 80/20 and higher blends are often so much more expensive that the cost per usable pound is still cheaper for the fatty stuff.
As long as you drain the meat well, it works fine.
70/30 makes good burgers.
May be a bit much for pan fried, but on the grill it works well and all the flaming fat that drips out gives them a nice char broiled flavor.
Also anything where you might otherwise run the risk of having it dry, like some said meat loaf, depending on how you make it.
I would not recommend duplicating Taco Bell filling for any reason, unless you are doing an independent study of IBS with diarrhea
It works fine for panfried burgers (which is the way I prefer my burgers), but I wouldn’t go too thick on those. I’m talking 1/4 pounders and skinnier. I like mine somewhere on the order of 6 or 8 to a pound.
I’m not a meatloaf maker, so you have all answered my own question. Whenever I’ve purchased it (and not recently, believe me) I swore it was 27% meat and 73% fat.
One of the other things to notice is that the 70-30 and 73-27 stuff is usually (at least around here) labeled “ground beef,” while the 80-20 is “ground chuck.” So the former can be an assortment of cuts and fat, and the latter is specifically chuck.
While I do buy 73-27 because I like fatty meat for certain applications, how much cheaper is it for you guys? At my local supermarket, the difference is about $0.50/lb between the two. Usually, it’s something like $2.49/lb 73-27 beef, $3/lb 80-20 chuck, $3.50-$3.75/lb 85-15 round, $4.25-$4.50/lb 93/7 sirloin. (You might have to add $0.50 to all the prices, as beef has gone up a bit over the last couple of weeks, although I haven’t bought ground in that time.)
I used oats for a long time until a good recipe convinced me to go back to my mother’s standby, crushed saltines. It’s not just for cheap extending, but produces a better result.
The absurd precision makes me think it’s regulatory or rule driven rather than an arbitrary mix.
Yeah, I’ve always wondered where that number comes from. It must be some sort of rule/law/regulation, but all I’ve found was that ground beef can be no more than 30% fat under labeling laws, so I don’t know where the 73/27 comes from.
Yes, but I was raised by an Adelle Davis disciple. Oats have protein and fiber, so I don’t feel quite so guilty using them as filler. And since I was raised on oatmeatloaf, I like the texture.
(In a related note, I’m quietly chuckling to myself over the current uproar that Subway is using fillers in their “chicken”. Things we do in a home kitchen that cause people to lose their minds when restaurants do them…)
As do I. I use 80/20 and mix with ground lamb and lean ground beef for my meatloaf, then freeform it in a roasting dish. Using really fatty ground in a loaf pan would be pretty disgusting, IMO, as you would just be boiling the meat in grease. 80/20 burgers are just perfect.