I’m looking some worldly opinions from the SDMB.
Situation: I work for a newly private company (a division spin off from a listed company). The owner is the ex CEO of one of Australia’s 50 biggest companies. So he’s got a ego slightly larger than the planet … the ephalet “pompous” is often used. However, he’s highly intelligent, shrewd, open to a good argument but is surrounded by “yes men”.
We’ve recently had a couple of senior managers leave, taking significant chunks of the business with them. His initial reaction, to an extent understandable, is to tighten data security systems to the point where IMHO it will stifle the business. It also won’t have the desired result anyway.
Now the board meeting to formalise this policy is tomorrow. My boss is the CFO/CIO who is present the board paper. He’s wuzzed out and wants me to present the “No” case. Prick.
I’ll have zero support in the meeting, except the knowledge that the owner will give a fair hearing. The rest of the board are handpicked toadies. Win the owner we’re cooking with gas, lose and the argument will crash, burn and die an orphan. My job isn’t on the line, but if the controls get ratchetted up, my function becomes bloody awkward.
**Requirement: **I’ve got plenty of meat to support the “No” argument. What I’m looking for is a hook. I am looking for a example/aphorism/fable to illustrate that sometimes the intuitive reaction is not the best reaction and may be counterproductive. It’s got to be short and direct. Preferably well known rather than some obscure text. Ideally I’ll use it to top and tail the case.
Any ideas?
Any comments would be greatly appreciated.