OK, I should be fair: Maybe the comma is there, but the scan is so low-resolution it blends into the dark newsprint background. That would make all my jokes about another Haggard being gay quite uncalled-for. I mean, I’m sure a few straight guys have hung around a comma chameleon.
Ah. The Oxford comma. There are decent arguments for and against, but I find that 95% of the time, its presence is preferred.
Wikipedia has the sentence: “To my parents, Ayn Rand and God,” along with your example. Of course to some, I wouldn’t put it past them thinking it’s true.
Officially, when Kris Kristofferson wrote Me and Bobbie McGee it was supposedly about a woman, but Janis Joplin covered it she “changed” Bobby to a man. Now I’m wondering if Haggard was the inspiration and Kris just wasn’t able to admit it yet so he had a she-singer cover it so he wouldn’t have to betray his husband.
Their “creating” section is a third the size of the “resolving” section. I don’t really get it either. Anyone messes with my comma and I will rendition them to Oxford for reeducation.
I recall proofreading a book where the author had written of someone "behind the tree where she was hiding, watching and waiting. The copy-editor had inserted a comma after watching, which I removed, figuring that she was watching and waiting behind the tree where she was hiding more so than doing all three. Proper consistent use of the serial comma can prevent such ambiguities.
Incidentally, what is the book dedicated “To my parents, Ayn Rand and God”? I’ve heard the example millions of times, but have never tracked it down.
And then there’s my favorite proper apostrophe usage example:
All those old things in my basement are my ex-husband’s.
All those old things in my basement are my ex-husbands.