It’ll probably be like the man says, just like the beginning of the last century. But it sure would be cool if we came up with something interesting to call it. Like maybe
“the 2K’s” or the “nil’s”
That would be kinda cool.
“I was being honest, @$$hole, I would expect YOU to know the difference.”
~~John Bender in The Breakfast Club.
Talk to me, baby! mcdsanti@hotmail.com
It does reappear frequently, doesn’t it? I think the best answer is probably, “Why don’t you just hang around and see what we wind up calling this decade?”
No! Lets make a decision now, and stick with it! Legislate it as the definitive name, and be incredibly famous for fifteen whole minutes over this momentous piece of pointlessness!
I was thinking about it over the weekend, and my gut feeling is that we will refer to the coming years as “oh-one,” “oh-two,” etc. Thus, the decade will be known as the “Ohs”.
I’m not happy about this, but I fear it’s the way it will probably be.
I think “the thousands” has an outside chance, too.
The idea that decades have “names” is comparatively new. There were the Gay 90s, of course (1890s, and not the use of the word “gay” that you’re thinking of)… and the Mauve Decade and the Roaring 20s. Those terms were in contemporary use (at the time those decades were going on).
But when historians or sociologists describe “The 60s”, they usually start that era in 1963 (Kennedy assassination) or 1964 (Beatles arrival in the U.S.) … and end it around 1974 (Nixon resignation) or some such point. Decades as we think of 'em and decades as history thinks of 'em, needn’t coincide.