Now there’s an excuse worth running with.
“Why do you insist on reading all that stupid porn?”
“But, honey! It helps me hear God better! You aren’t trying to cut me off from God now, are you?!”
God is in the Details.
Which doesn’t change the fact that the mission was indeed completed, and using a word to refer to those who simply support some of the policies of the nation that’s already in existence is somewhat odd. It’d be a bit like referring to Americans as Founding Fathers if other people argued that America should be eliminated.
*Which is exactly what happened in '48. *
And the ‘migration’ in Israel didn’t continue for the next 50 years at all. In fact, if the Arab nations had accepted its existence there would’ve been no further wars and Israel would have actual borders on all sides rather than armistice lines.
I’m not arguing that it isn’t odd. Still, fact is the word existed in the first place. It’s simply an accident of coinage.
There were actually similar words- Pakstan was a coinage describing the existing populations of the five provinces which eventually mostly became Pakistan, and the people who agitated for a separate Muslim state to be carved out of India were called the Pakstan Movement. The difference in that case, of course, is that the name of the movement became the name of the country.
It’s not as though anti-Semites refer to Israel as Zion.
Sure it did. Just under 3.5 million people have immigrated to Israel since 1948, or just under half of the present population. The largest single influx by decade was between 1990 and 1999, which I assume was mostly due to the breakup of the Soviet Union.
I never said it didn’t exist in the first place. I’m pointing out that it’s odd that a word which existed and was used to describe those who wanted to found Israel is now used, often as code, to describe those who support some of its policies. We don’t refer to Americans as founding fathers or secessionists, nor, if someone talks about American intelligence findings, do we talk about “founding father propaganda.”
You’re committing the fallacy of equivocation. There is a distinct difference between birth and immigration and migration. America, for instance, has not had a period of migration since we stretched from sea to sea, but we’ve had quite a bit of growth and immigration. Likewise, Israelis wouldn’t have lived in the West Bank or Gaza if the Arab powers hadn’t tried for another round of genocide in '67.
As it is, a huge chunk of both the Jewish and Arab populations immigrated into the Levant pre 1948 (largely because the Jews dramatically raised the standard of living for everybody in the region), which is part of the reason that the UNRWA defines anybody as Palestinians if they or their ancestors moved to the area as little as a few years before 1948. But the fact (that you were arguing and were incorrect about) remains that the partition was drawn along ethnic majority lines among the people who were already living there and future waves of immigration came into the area that Israel already controlled and did not cause migration into new territories, unlike for instance the period of American expansionism.
This is a fact that everyone seems to either not know, or conveniently forget.
But, bah, I’m tired of all these legitimate cites and discussions over actual history. Damnit, I came to this thread for quality racism and I’ve been disappointed with mere spurts of racism interspersed with rambling anecdotes about paint drying. Come on, this is not the quality racism that I was hoping for.
Now chop chop, let’s get to it. Let’s get an elaboration of God’s Racist Hierarchy and why having white skin, believing a certain theology and having a penis makes you lord of the world, and how you know that Satan created Jews. Genetic testing for the Satan Gene would be a plus.
Also requested are: actual elaboration on who the ‘fake’ and the ‘real’ Jews are and how you can tell them apart, how the Jewlumminati control the world and why, how the Christian Joseph Stalin was actually a secret Jew, how the Christian Adolph Hitler was actually a secret Jew, how even though all the facts show that the Jews played a minute role in the slave trade they actually ran the whole thing, how the Jews have a tradition of training their daughters to be evil seductresses and so on.
I know, I know, asking you to provide the basest of proof for your racist nonsense is “nitpicking” because the idiots you’re used to persuading don’t have the critical thinking skills to reason their way out of a wet paper bag. But do try to bear the heroic burden of justifying your claims with actual proof just to satisfy those nasty nitpicking *Proofers. *
Ready? Aaaaannnnnddd… racism is a go!
Well, it’s not technically racism if the white Christian male really is superior, is it? 
Meh. Weak racism. Would Goebbels have offered a winking smilie after telling us about how the Jews are evil and crave only money and formed dastardly secret conspiracies behind the decay of western society? Would the Kossacks have offered a cheerful wink after pogromin’ it up and raping some Jewish women and burning a few houses? No!
I demand quality racism!
This post reminds me of a running joke I had with an old, former supervisor of mine. He would write performance appraisals of me that described how much he respected me, how great my reputation was, how my work was regarded to be of the highest quality. But he made sure to never say that I actually did anything of any value.
So, I think I know you know what I’m saying here.
Also, I’d like to add that yesterday, in a serious meeting with serious people, someone was asked about a policy for tracking externally reported problems which referred to functions which don’t yet exist. He said he’d brought it to the policy board, and that they had no policy. I made him repeat that, just in case I heard it wrong. They have one freaking job, to be the place where we go to find out our policies, and they can’t even do that one little thing. THIS IS WHAT I’M TELLING YOU!
“If this is the Master Race, I’d hate to see the qualifying heats.”
Which brings me to another hilarious racist tidbit.
Evidently the Christian Identity folks want to pretend that they’re actually Israelites because they think that God put some sort of blessing on them since they’re the Chosen People. Of course, ignoring the fact that they also think that God put a curse on them and doesn’t want them to live in Israel as their own masters. Of course, ignoring the fact that would mean God is an impotent punk who can’t even overwhelm a bunch of Jews.
Anyways, yeah, so, Chosen People, master race, yadda yadda.
Of course that is, in and of itself, a bit of idiotic racist propaganda that they’ve begun to believe. The phrase “the Chosen People” doesn’t refer to any special powers or favor from God, but a set of obligations to follow the Law (note, not Jesus) that Jews must adhere to and gentiles can achieve an equal state of righteousness by simply following the Noahide Laws. Hilarious, but true, the CI racists pretend to be the real Jews because they fell for their own racists fiction and believe that being Chosen is some sort of awesome state to be in rather than one bitch of a burden.
Proving that Universe is not without a sense of humor.
Biblical references too numerous to cite individually do exist which state that men and women are nearly-equal partners having complementary roles. Complementary in the sense that each completes the other. It’s about teamwork. In the Bible, it is clearly stated that the husband is to be the head of the household and his wife to be the heart. Every successful marriage I have ever seen in action has had one thing in common, that husband and wife make decisions together as a team with the final approval (line-item addition and/or line-item veto) up to the husband.
Major purchase decisions that my parents made over the years worked that way. Mom or Dad would suggest something, and the two of them would subsequently negotiate the details. Whether buying a house, a car an appliance, or whatever, there were always negotiations involved and Dad would approve Mom’s suggestions contingent on minor modifications that he suggested. If Mom cited the high fuel economy of a four-cylinder engine as a high priority, Dad would remind her that the four-cylinder engine offered for that model had reliability issues, suggest the V6 engine option instead as a compromise between the ultra-reliable V8 and the failure-prone L4. Teamwork, rather than headstrong power struggles.
Here is an excellent article on the subject of the complementary and slightly-unequal nature of gender roles: Q&A: Gender Roles
It’s not a Master / Slave dynamic, more like President and Vice President of the household. To express it quantitatively, delegation of a specific set of complementary Rights and Responsibilities as approximately 51% to Man, 49% to Woman. Does it make more sense now?
The Kenite concept of radical Feminism attempts to sabotage proper interpretation God’s distribution of Rights and Responsibilities between genders, thus inciting conflict which hinders the ability of men and women to properly practice cooperation as God intended.
“Be ye not equally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? And what communion hath light with darkness?” (2 Cor. 6:14, KJV).
Likewise not a Master / Slave dynamic, but those who know and accept the Messiah are to be counted, to a small measure anyway, as more wise than those who do not. Not all who call themselves Christian really understand the concept, but some of us do understand it. Some might even misinterpret that small measure of higher authority as a Master / Slave dynamic. While knowing the Messiah will spare those somewhat-ignorant souls from being cast into Hell for their error, I believe God will certainly point out that error to them and that those who knew better will receive a greater reward for their greater understanding of God’s intent than those who misunderstood Him.
Again, it’s not a Master / Slave dynamic, but the characteristics of each race differ to a degree and tend to be complementary. Different responsibilities are delegated to the persons whose abilities best fit the job duties. Re-read Chapter 1 of Genesis. The following two Verses quoted for emphasis.
Note that Adam had not yet been created at the end of the Sixth Day when God pronounced what had been created thus far to be good. As Chapter 2 opens, God declared that the Seventh Day would be the Day of Rest. On the Eighth Day, God re-evaluates what He has done so far, clearly stating that all was still good and yet clearly having decided that some additions would be needed to fully complete the Creation. Among Eighth Day additions to His work are the Rain Cycle to improve water distribution further and Adam to fill a kind of District Manager role. A higher consciousness was given to Adam (Human 2.0 as a handy analogy) which was not mentioned when Human 1.x was created in Genesis 1:26-27. It is also to be noted that male and female Human 1.X were created together as part of the same task in Genesis 1:26-27. Eve was created as a partner for Adam as described in Genesis 2:21-23, as a completion of him. While Genesis Chapter 1 does not directly deal with the question of gender roles for Human 1.X, it is subsequently established in various places throughout Scripture that gender roles among non-Israelites (and, yes, even Kenites, although not directly specified as such) would ideally follow the same nearly-equal partnership model as applies to gender roles among Israelites.
Superiority, no. Somewhat unequal measure of authority, definitely. This does not mean that willfully and knowingly abusing that greater measure of authority is ever justifiable. I do not bark orders at my employees at the end of a bullwhip. I manage and delegate tasks to them, expecting completion of those tasks as assigned and inviting questions and suggestions. Appropriate suggestions, I often accept or suggest amendments to them followed by acceptance of the suggestion as amended.
Recently, I had occasion to coach a young Apprentice employed part-time as a subcontractor on the importance of following directions. He was directed to install a replacement part which I had in stock. Instead, he devoted time equivalent to the cost of the replacement part to unsuccessfully attempting repair of the faulty part. We had a private meeting later that day. I deducted the unproductive time from his timesheet with a notation as to the reason and indicated that future salvage attempts were to be made on his own time and that those on which he succeeded might be marketable to me as used parts for such future applications in which a reconditioned part was suitable. Was this a suitable illustration of my point?
Had you not blatantly ignored the context of what I had said, it would be clear that I was actually saying that my girlfriend’s apparently-hereditary financial ineptitude was indicative of the absurd nature of the suggestion that she could be some sort of stealth-conspirator. The point was that if she and her family were that well-connected with some conspiracy then one would think that there would be far fewer Bankruptcies and Foreclosures in her family’s finances. Jewish ancestry wasn’t the point, obvious lack of well-connected status and its obvious contradiction of the suggestion that she could be some well-connected conspirator was. **Covert Operations **work probably pays a lot better than what I know her to earn, having helped her with her taxes for more than 5 years. lol I doubt that she even knows any of the real conspirators personally. Certainly no one with a billion dollar bank balance (the minimum wealth that I believe the topmost players would consider prerequisite to being deemed worthy of regard as peers and being in the loop as to the overall Endgame plan) lives within 500 miles of either of us or has any connection to either of our families. Neither her bosses at her workplace nor my wealthiest clients or suppliers have anywhere near that much money lying around. As to conspiracy, it is abundantly clear from observing the vast disparity between privileges enjoyed by the fabulously wealthy and the daily struggles of the middle classes and the poor that Big Money rules the world, be it in Jewish hands or not! It is also clear that the wealthiest of the wealthy have historically sought more for themselves at the expense of leaving less to the rest of the world. It is quite clear that 0.00005% of the world’s population controls 99.99995% of the world’s resources, at least indirectly (based on approximations of a global population of 6,000,000,000 of whom approximately 3,000 may qualify as ultra-wealthy individuals).
Amusing, but indicative that you probably weren’t paying attention. The point was that I’m not here to entertain you. Other than the time it takes to skim and reply occasionally, I have better things to do with the other 22-23 hours of my days. Between composing a morning and evening post punctuated by skimming the thread for 10 seconds of an occasional break, some 90 daily minutes out of a few days, a few brief visits, is all I consider this board worth. Some of you seem to live here. As to your insinuations about my mental state. Pot and kettle, there, “Dr. Freud”, pot and kettle.
Funny you should make such an insinuation. Speaking of pots and kettles (see reply to Attack from the 3rd dimension immediately above my quote of your insinuation), you might want to read the linked article http://www.white-history.com/refuting_rm/inbreeding.html
As for listing which of the Protocols are currently faits accompli, it would require more than the 90 minutes or so I spend here on any given day to compose a suitably-bibliographied itemized list. I’ll take a few days of not bothering to compose replies to the typical crop of repeated Beverly Hillillies, inbreeding, KKK, Nazi, misogyny, and tinfoil-hat insinuations that have become so predictable as to no longer warrant retorts. Incidentally, The Beverly Hillbillies was a show loaded with racist stereotyping of the (allegedly inferior to the show’s oh-so-superior Jewish creator, Paul Henning) rugged Country folk of the Appalacian region. Who are the real racists again? Does Moses Maimonaides sound familiar? Even Jews, although mocked as “self-hating Jews” by those Jews who agree with Maimonaides’ supremacism, regard his positions as indefensible. My girlfriend is of the opinion that Maimonaides’ blatant supremacism is indefensible. She believes that Maimonaides is more likely to endure the torment alleged to be inflicted upon “Balaam” (aka Christ). She also acknowledges the ex-husband of one of her cousins as “one of those Jews who make the rest of us ashamed to claim them” and stating that she’s “glad the guy is only the ex-spouse of a blood relative” and not actually related to her.
The post wherein I intend to list and cite references for which of the Protocols have been fulfilled will probably mark the last day of my spending valuable time here on this thread. On Witnessing to the overtly hostile, one eventually comes to apply Matthew 7:6 to certain attempts after a while.
Interesting that when you were directly asked about your silly beliefs regarding supposed “race,” you explicitly quoted the question, then went back into your male/female schtick and evaded the question.
Since you aren’t really bringing a debate, you pretty much are just here to entertain us.
Gotta love a thread where requests to prove the veracity of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are met with cites from The Beverly Hillbillies.
Does this mean that Biden is giving Obama blow-jobs?
Regards,
Shodan
Sometimes being an atheist makes things so much simpler. I don’t have to try to point out the errors of understanding someone got out of the Bible, I can just call the whole thing malarkey.
Now, this is just silly. While Biden may be in the role of the wife here, Barak HUSSEIN Obama is still black (and not Christian, anyway!) so obviously Biden still outranks him in the Hierarchy :rolleyes:
Addendum to my latest post: In an earlier post to this thread or the old one, I was taken to task to defend the Bible on the grounds that Scripture was allegedly self-contradicting. Now, let’s take on a single example (as a starting point) of a mis-translated part of counterfeit Judeo-Christianity and analyze the alleged contradictions that its mis-translation artificially introduces. Genuine Christianity addresses the *self-contradiction *allegations quite well. This mis-translation, in fact, appears to be a deliberate semantic deception inserted by Scribes (who were Kenites) long ago. Returning to the earliest languages in which the Bible is known to have existed, Reverend Ted Pike of http://www.truthtellers.org/ and other Pastors not vastly funded by Kenites on the condition of their preaching falsehoods as “Truth” and admonishing against any questioning of Church Doctrine, have determined that the Sixth Commandment originally read “Thou Shalt Not Murder!” The substitution of the word “kill” for “murder” falsely creates the appearance of contradiction throughout Scripture. To Kill is to take any life regardless of circumstances. To Murder refers specifically to the taking of human life without Just Cause for doing so.
If God forbids Man to engage in the taking of any life under any circumstances, why then are there such numerous Biblical references in which it is clearly permissible: to slaughter animals for meat to eat or skins to make into clothing, etc.; to take the life of another human being in the case of self-defense (one’s own life from a would-be murderer, and, in the case of one’s catching a thief plying his trade under cover of night, one’s property from a thief); to wage war for a clearly Just Cause; to execute those convicted of capital offenses? How would Man even be permitted to eat fruits or vegetables, since that would be killing plant life according to tree-hugger radicals? Here’s the part I find most telling. The same people who cite the Sixth Commandment as a blanket prohibition against: capital punishment; consumption of meat; allegedly harming the ecosystem through logging, etc. … are at the top of the contributor lists of pro-abortion groups! Can you say hypocrisy, boys and girls? I knew you could!
When the original Sixth Commandment is translated correctly into English as “Thou Shalt Not Murder!”, every single contradiction of Himself blasphemously alleged against Him by misogynists (God-haters) with regard to the Sixth Commandment miraculously evaporates.
IOW, you gots nuffin’. I’m militantly unsurprised…
-XT