If not Punha, how about NoClueBoy? Or both of them?! 
Failing that, [Broad British Country Voice]I suppose I could, lads. Just let me get me skivvies off.[/Broad British Country Voice]
CJ
nah, fi they BOTH ran naked together, people would say they were gay (scandalous!!!)
Something tells me Seigs will have a video cam ready…
Your wish … well, this wish my my command;)
::runs through thread nekkid::
WOOOOOOOoooooooo!
yay!
Thank you, now go get dressed!
(do you think any fundies were lookin?) :o
And I got the tape! Those of you who want copies, let me know. The proceeds will to go a nice wedding present for impunha. Nice to know he’s still got his old form!
CJ
apologies to gobear for this irreverence, but fundies need to be shown irreverence.
I’m sure their eyes mentally inserted fig leaves (more than one necessary…) where appropriate:D
Hence, this thread. Nothing exorcises fundies like laughing at them.
I never called Lib a fundie vanilla, and suggesting I did is being entirely dishonest. I can provide a recent thread in which Lib very deliberately suggests that Athiests as a whole should “stand up” and “grow more balls” and be more handstabby (in so little words), like REAL athiests, blah blah blah, AKA the recent jehova witness thread, do you wish me to provide a link to libs posts? I will be more than willing to do that, In nearly 14k posts, I am sure several hundred are him referring handstabbing athiests, and 3/4 of those suggest, more than subtlely in most cases, that ALL athiests are such. (except a few he names by name, like Gaudere for example)
Ask and you shall recieve.
Most pit threads that lib enters eventally center around him. He is an attention whore, I am just giving him his due.
I’ve been listening to the Avenue Q OCR and one of the songs seems apropos to you two:
Yeah, what about “familiarity breeds contempt?”
I admire Libertarians knowledge and am in somewhat awe of his intelligence in some ways, so yeah, I suppose your comparison could be vaild. Doesn’t mean I have to LIKE him though, or respect him as a person. (why respect a bully, even if he does have quite a bit of friends)
And nobody is allowed to have same sex marriage too… so why are you against paedophilia again?
Bad english? err… Anyway your Korean sux.
Did I ever say child sex trade was driven by poofs? I dont think so. And how can you say almost entirely? Cites? Ignorant, stupid and illiterate… together with gay… wow…
Err… how the fuck do you figure this out… riiiiight… all men are paedophiles… just like all men are homosexuals… yup… that’s it…
Two contrasting? Learn to read english before you reply, you faggot.
Bad english? err… Anyway your Korean sux.
Did I ever say child sex trade was driven by poofs? I dont think so. And how can you say almost entirely? Cites? Ignorant, stupid and illiterate… together with gay… wow…
Err… how the fuck do you figure this out… riiiiight… all men are paedophiles… just like all men are homosexuals… yup… that’s it…
Two contrasting? Learn to read english before you reply, you faggot.
At the risk of attempting to educate the ineligible, SSM (same-sex marriage) is permissible in more than one country, and movements are currently underway in a handful of areas in this country to allow for it.
I remain in steadfast support of laws protecting children from pedophiles because, among other reasons, the very nature of the manifestation of pedophilia provides for nothing for the child. The child is raped, molested, abused, what have you. The pedophile’s principle thought (beyond, of course, the naked child) is to avoid getting caught.
The notion that a pedophile-victim system is in any meaningful way comparable to two human consenting adults of any gender is so preposterous as to seriously call into question what education you have on the matter, jkim. Or, really, what education you have beyond being able to type.
And do check the first page of this thread, dear being, for a more in-depth look at my sexuality than what you have thus far displayed.
Oh, one last thing. That whole throwing around terms for homosexuals as slurs? Verboten here. Might want to stop doing that before a moderator puts you in your place - the bottom of Frank Burns’s cesspool, in your case.
Best of luck running a phone line down there.
Yes, Epimetheus, you are acting like an asshole. Now, that’s not necessarily a bad thing. But recognizing it is the important step.
And as near as I can tell vanilla in no way suggested you called Lib a fundie. So it seems your ragging on her is unnecessary, premature, and–dare I say it?–kinda assholish.
In short, do try to get over yourself, there’s a good lad.
jkim78 blustered:
two
\Two, n. 1. The sum of one and one; the number next greater than one, and next less than three; two units or objects.
- A symbol representing two units, as 2, II., or ii.
In two, asunder; into parts; in halves; in twain; as, cut in two.
contrasting
Contrast \Con*trast", v. i. [imp. & p. p. Contrasted; p. pr. & vb. n. Contrasting.] [F. contraster, LL. contrastare to resist, withstand, fr. L. contra + stare to stand. See Stand.] To stand in opposition; to exhibit difference, unlikeness, or opposition of qualities.
The joints which divide the sandstone contrast finely with the divisional planes which separate the basalt into pillars. --Lyell.
*Source: Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc. *
Looks like english to me. What the fuck are you on about?
He’s taking the tried and true “attack the typoes, not the typist” style of debate. It’s the equivalent of “I know you are, but what am I?” in terms of both relevancy and efficacy.
Ohhhhhhhh. I get it. There was an extra R in there, wasn’t there?
Well, I think that certainly qualifies as assholery of the first order.