Do you guys use a knock-off weber? Because the real weber doesn’t have a capitol “W” in it’s logo
Harumph. If your wife is truely the most beautiful creature in creation, then she must have a full body tattoo of MY wife…
It doesn’t have a reversed “r” or any other reversed letters, either, and the font is different than what I use, too, but I assumed you’d figure all that out.
I’m a guy and I think most guys look stupid with tattoos but I also think a lot of women are aexy with them. The only thing I really hate though are those people whose tattoos seem to have no rhyme, reason or progression: The people I’m thinking of it looks like someone had a bag of shitty tattoos and just randomly threw them all over their body.
I said she was the most beautiful creature in creation in MY eyes, not yours. I’m sure the converse is true.
That poor guy!
Is he OK with you talking about it here? You don’t have any pet names for him like “Mesquite” do you…? 
I personally am not into tattoos, but if someone else wants one, well, it’s their body, and they’ll have to live with the fallout (if any).
But I do think you have to think ahead when getting one. My niece had a Sun tattooed on the left side of her abdomen. It was ugly and poorly done to begin with–just a circle with green triangles coming out of it–and when she got pregnant, it went supernova and now she has a hideous, misshapen blob on her stomach. I would suspect she regrets it now, but it would be painful and costly to remove, if it could be truly removed.
And there is the age thing. How’s it going to look when you’re 70 and you’ve got a faded “Young & Wild” cascading down on the cellulite of your thigh? Pretty bad, I’d think. But if you’re 70 and you’ve got a delicate spray of flowers on the back of your neck, probably not so bad.
Mostly, though, I like to see tattoos that are unique and personal, not the “Oh everyone’s getting a butterfly on the small of their back, I’m gonna get one too!” cookie cutter stuff.
Missed the edit window but: Kevin Durant’s outie belly button looks worse than all the tattoos combined.
Walgreen’s and the Washington Nationals have the same logo. Not sure why you’d tattoo yourself with either. I’ve considered getting a StL Cardinals logo tattoo, but I grew up watching the Cardinals. Nobody grew up watching the Nats, except for people under the age of 10.
For the notion that tattoos are a fad, and will be going out of style soon and then you’ll be sorry. Well, the thing about tattoos is that they’re pretty much permanent. So with millions of people having tattoos nowadays they’re not ever going out of style, because you’re stuck with them.
And sitting in a nursing home, looking at your “party naked” tattoo you got back in college, are you really going to think, “Wow that looks terrible, if only I had my regular wrinkly old-ass skin instead!” No, you’ll be old and wrinkly and the various smears and blobs and scars you’ve accumulated will just be one more evidence of old age. Maybe you’ll wish you were young and beautiful again, but you’re not going to imagine that if only you hadn’t gotten that damn tattoo you’d be young and beautiful.
It may be than in a decade or two young people stop getting tattoos and tattoos will become old-fashioned. So? By that time we’ll all be old fashioned, and old-fashioned tattoos will just be proof. It ain’t like not having tattoos will make your old ass look young and beautiful.
I don’t have any tattoos, never will get a tattoo, and think most tattoos are kind of silly. I just think “In 50 years you’re gonna regret it!” is a pretty stupid argument against tattoos.
The problem with old tattoos isn’t that the skin is saggy, it’s that they blur and fade and generally look like crap. At least the ones I have seen on older folks. I wonder though, if the inks are better now?
Yes. My first tattoo (35 years old) is indistinguishable from the one I got 3 weeks ago. I have taken great care (sunscreen) of all my work, though.
I personally detest tattoos, but this is subjective. What one considers to be “defacing” the human body (tattoos,) another may consider “enhancing.”
Of all the times I have related personal information about my spouse, you are the first to ask that question!
Since he regularly tells the story himself, sometimes to people he barely knows/just met, I’m going to assume it’s OK.
No, it’s a real story, he really does have the reverse “weber” on his ass, but since I can’t exactly reproduce the font from the grill I improvised. I thought most people would realize that.
I’ve seen senior citizens, both men and women, with obviously new(er) tattoos on their wrinkly flesh. I understand that many of them always wanted to do it, and now that it’s socially acceptable to have them and they no longer have to worry about employer dress codes, etc. they decided to go ahead and get it done.
My uncle, who’s now in his 70s, has a large scar on his forearm that looks like a burn scar. When I was a little kid, I asked him what happened to him, and he replied, “I had a tattoo removed” and his whole demeanor said, “Don’t you ever get one!” Back then, he had to have the tattoo completely cut off and a skin graft to cover the denuded area. :eek: We don’t know what that tattoo was, and honestly, I for one probably don’t want to. 
Your story is 100% bullshit. In no way did your spouse sit on or back in to a grill of any type and get branded with a weber logo.
Since there’s no way the mods will allow me to post a picture of my spouse’s bare ass even if I was willing to do that (and I’m not) there’s no way to prove it anyhow. On the other hand, lots of people HAVE had accidents with hot grills so I fail to see why the story strikes you as so completely impossible.
It did happen, he does have the scarring, and your disbelief does not make it less real.
2-click rule and a close up.