MFF?
4 hands.
10 fingers.
4 holes.
2 mouths.
2 words.
Premature ejaculation. :eek: 
Because kissing is easier with three people.
The noses don’t get in the way.
Just dropping in to say I’m one more guy that DOESN’T have Threesomes as a big fantasy… one woman at a time is already a lot to take care of. 
It’s a nice fantasy to think that two women would be attracted to me enough to have sex with me and put aside any sort of “I’m not a lesbian/I’m not sharing” ideas.
I want to know what you’re kissing. Or maybe I don’t. But I’m thinking it’s not faces.
ROFL, exactly
Unless those two guys are gay. Or those two girls are gay. Or at the very least bi-sexual.
The simple answer is because it’s fun.
Nope, just regular old kissing (except for the three-people part).
Do most guys have a particular urge for threesomes?
I’m gay, so obviously my take is different. I wouldn’t particularly get anything out of a threesome. It certainly doesn’t seem like a magic number, to justify the way straight men seem to get so excited by the concept. I’d be more into a gangbang, but only in fantasy. Generally, though, one is fine. I just think most perversions are perfect with just two participants.
Is a foursome better than a threesome? I mean, is it just “more naked women!”? Or is there something special about the number three?
One male vote against.
Of threesome pr0n (MFF) I have seen, my general thought was that it mostly just seemed rude, as the man isn’t able to please both women at the same time and so one girl simply gets ignored every once in a while.
If done right, no-one feels or gets ignored. Think of it as a journey, not a destination.
But your vote has been duly noted. One against. 
This is why it’s essential that the two girls in an MFF threesome are bi, or at least willing to go that direction.
In an MMF threesome the two guys don’t need to be bi, because the girl has more than one opening, as has already been noted.
They don’t need to be, but it sure makes it a hell of a lot more fun.
Evolution made us think this way.
You see, when a guy is with one girl and he completes inside her, we have one possibility for a pregnancy. Like all men, he is useless after he’s come (except me, of course ). However, if we introduce another lady into the equation and she starts messing around with the first girl, he will become…um, ready again. He can then complete inside the second girl. We now have two possible pregnancies where before we only had one and a better chance of the human species surviving.
In conclusion, men don’t want MFF threesomes because we’re pigs. We want them because it’s ingrained into our DNA. The survival of our species is at stake here. Come on, ladies! Be a little less selfish!
Hey, there was a little menage a trois that made some news around here this weekend. Not really what I’d be looking for in a relationship.
As a red-blooded straight male, I have to admit, I’m very, very fond of the idea. I really think it’s a simple matter of “more of a good thing is even better.” I’ve talked to a few men who’ve done it and said that they “didn’t know what to do with themselves” or something to that effect - that it was too hard to keep everyone happy. But I suspect this is the result of the “3 people get drunk and end up fumbling around in bed together” approach. I’ve heard of plenty of others, male and female, who have experienced FFM and MMF threesomes and had a great time, but they tended to come about without alcoholic assistance. As with anything, the right attitude helps. Yes, sometimes the practical considerations take some practice and/or planning, but when done right, my understanding is that it can be a whole lot of fun.
I’ve also run into a few women who seem to share the straight-female version of this fantasy - they’d love to be with two men at once. I’m open to that possibility, too. Not only does it just “seem fair,” but if I know another guy well enough to get naked in the same bed as him, his penis isn’t going to freak me out or anything, despite my straightness. And anything that brings pleasure to a woman I’m with is a good thing, even if that means calling in reinforcements. Heh…
What if it’s three guys, and all the attention is on you?
not even if we use puppy dog eyes? :rolleyes:
FLIRTING! THERE’S FLIRTING IN THIS POST! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!
For you…I might consider it.
But probably not, I’m way too embarrassed over this one. :o
One time I went to Chicago with some friends and I ended up making out with these two hot guys in a club. It was really fun, but I ended up liking one more than the other, and I chickened out when it was decision time.
Still, the idea of two men catering to my every desire is a lovely fantasy that I have sometimes. I don’t think I’ll ever go through with it, but it sure is fun to think about.
And I couldn’t be part of a two girl one guy situation, I’d get too jealous. I have to have the attention on me and it would drive me too crazy to have my man touching another woman. It might be ok if I was single and playing around with people I wasn’t serious about, but I am never ever going to share my man.
I like your attitude. I haven’t exactly spent my sexual life trying to wheedle guys into that sort of thing, but I have brought it up with a couple of them. I have noticed, however, that when one finds someone willing to agree to this, one can never find the extra person necessary. It is a fantasy of mine, as with the FMF threesome (though the reality didn’t measure up, so the thrill is pretty much gone), but it would have to be with two men that I was highly attracted to, not just my SO and some other random guy, or two random guys. For now, I’ll probably just keep writing about them and not ever actually have one.