Ann Coulter has as much redeeming value as a pile of shit, in that when she dies, she will be good fertilizer.
Hilary.
Theresa Heinz-Kerry (was in the pit quite a little bit two months ago)
Dianne Feinstein
Nancy Pelosi
Ann Coulter draws derision as a yellow journalist. Not as a conservative woman. I disagree with her views, but I disagree with urban chic’s views, too. The difference being, urban chic can back up what she says, and doesn’t feel the need to distort the facts or flat out lie when it suits her purpose.
I can’t be the only one who thinks that Pelosi must have been hot as hell back in the day.
But anyhoo:
That is what I am talking about. Of course conservatives criticize, sometimes sharply, lefty dames, but not to that foaming-at-the-mouth extent.
Posted by Brutus:
Read it. So, you feel that you’re among traitors? Or that you yourself are a traitor? Ah, Laddy, you’re a mystery.
If Ann Coulter counts as “conservative”, then the word has been stretched beyond any useful meaning. John McCain is conservative. Ann Coulter is a raving psychotic cunt*. Or at least she plays one on tv. In a way, if it were all an act, she’d be even more despicable.
*Note that I don’t use the term “cunt” with an intent to denigrate women; for me it’s a non-gender-specific insult, used only for extreme cases. For instance, Michael Savage is also a raving psychotic cunt. Bill O’Reilly – hypocritical, whiny bitch. Sean Hannity – wilfully ignorant twat.
At a glance I saw that as “monkey making out”.
They have those big, purple butts.
As for Canada existing, we tried to take them out during the Revolutionary War and/or 1812.
Oh. My. God.
Please tell me that you’re kidding. You of all people have no right to make that assertion.
Is anyone surprised Brutus buys into Coulter’s shit?
I’m not.
He’s thick as a brick.
Brutus… Moore does make some good points. From Bush’s failed business career to the cozy relationship with the Saudis. He might infer way to much… but you can’t compare that with Coulter saying Canadians should be happy they are allowed to be in the same continent.
Brutus I’ve understood your comments until now as criticism to “leftie” foaming rather than support for AC… care to confirm that you don’t buy into AC shit ?
Wow. Great Tull reference. I saw them back in the day. I even remember parts of that concert…
Brutus. We’re several posts down and you still haven’t answered my question. Is there any conservative here willing to give me an answer? Why do you tolerate and endorse this type of hypocracy in prominent journalists and politicians inside your party? Why do you criticize the so-called liberal media for its bias and misleading stories, but defend people like Ann Coulter and John Hannity when they do the exact same thing?
Some. I don’t think I am under any obligation to agree with everything she says or writes, nor am I obliged to disagree with everything she says or writes. Some is insightful, some is ha-ha funny, and some I disagree with.
And you still haven’t retracted that damned fool ‘Libertarian’ claim. Damned insulting to true Libertarians.
What journalists?
You should have asked Santa to bring you understanding of the difference between ‘commentary’ and ‘news’. Ann and Sean don’t purport to be newcasters; They are commentators.
Because they’re on his side?
Bush is an inarticulate dumb rich guy with a ranch who talks like folks.
Kerry is an articulate rich guy with a butler who speaks in the manner of an elitist.
They’re both assholes, but a Democratic asshole would have seen that the kids in Mississippi continue to get school lunches and my social security works in thirty years. One puts up with shit and keeps the good stuff. Folks in my area felt Bush was more like them.
I understand why they support them. I just don’t understand how they can smugly claim to be superior, and when called on the carpet about their actions, say “But he did it FIRST!” And then, when called on it, change the subject and act like they did nothing wrong at all. Where’s the accountability conservatives proudly spout about all the time?
I don’t criticize Ann Coulter because she’s a conservative woman. There are so many better reasons. I criticize her because she’s a hate-filled, venomous, judgemental demagogue harpy. She’s impugned the patriotism of triple-amputee war veterans by spreading vile lies, and she publically called for the execution of John Walker “to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed too”. In her pride she has given herself the moral authority to judge me and anyone who thinks like me as “evil”.
I’m a liberal agnostic university professor who favours gay marriage, legal access to abortion, and strict separation of church and state; as such, Ann Coulter and her ilk have made it abundently clear that they view me as an enemy and have given no indication that they will back down from that view, ever. Why on earth should I be expected not to criticize that, with all the force I can muster?
I put Coulter and Franken in the same boat; clowns not to be taken seriously. Why anyone would get worked up about either of them is beyond me.
With regards to Coulter being a Libertarian, as far as I know she’s firmly opposed to legalizing drugs. I’m pretty sure Libertarians make you shoot up heroin to prove you’re one of them. Or something like that…
Golly gosh gee willikers, Maureen. We’re several posts down and you still haven’t admitted your ‘who is a Libertarian, btw’ mistake.
Pick your favorite embedded journalist from Fox News. They’ve given us an unbiased view of what’s going on in Iraq, right? :rolleyes:
And you should ask your big sky daddy to bring you the ability to answer a simple question. Really, is Don Hannity so worthy of my attention that I should get his name right?
Coulter told a crowd a 3,500 cheering Republicans that John Walker should be killed to remind liberals “that they can be killed too.”
Franken calls people liars.
You’ll understand, I hope, if I see a difference.
If factual accuracy is a concern of yours, then yes, you should get his name right. You have shown your disdain for mere ‘facts’, though.
Why? Do you take either of them seriously?