What you’re still missing is that I don’t particularly care about what Bush did or didn’t do in the 70’s, my point is about the left attacking the right for dirty pool while doing the exact same type of thing themselves is hypocritical. Interesting how that little nugget keeps getting ignored in favor of a side topic, no matter how many times I mention that Bush or Kerry’s service record is not the topic I’m posting about. Misdirection: The refuge of magicians, scoundrels…and politicos:p.
Agreed. There is an undeniable symbiosis between Canada and the U.S…
Coulter’s style of delivery is pure entertainment and trolling. Yet, there is some truth buried in her spew, if you dig for it. But, like picking through warm vomit, it’s an unsavory task.
In your dreams. He was never charged, true, but Clinton was never charged with perjury either.
Example of “the left doing the exact same type of thing themselves”, please? Or is this yet another example of the tight right’s endless tu quoque crap?
And well used by such as the Swifties, who neutralized Bush’s own disrespectable Vietnam-era behavior by trying to make Kerry’s disrespectable as well. Bought it, didn’tja?
Not at all, Miller. He’s totally reinforcing my theory, which Brutus was kind enough to prove last night. Neo-cons’ sole defense of any egregious act on the part of any conservative politician or journalist is “XXX Democrat did this, which is comparable, so it cancels out.” And then, when you stand there in shocked amazement that anyone would actually use such a childish argument and expect to be taken seriously, they think they’ve won the argument. :rolleyes:
Even more interesting was Coulter’s reaction to it – she shreiked that what Franken had done was misleading, before realizing that Franken’s whole point may have been to catch her admitting as much. It was like watching Ali demolish Foreman.
It was then that I concluded that Coulter is dead earnest, as opposed to ‘laughing all the way to the bank’ – no one with any self-awareness would have fallen for Franken’s trap.
Oh, Jesus, do you even read what you’re typing? Look up one line. See where someone said "In your dreams. He was never charged, true,(but I’m going to call him A.W.O.L. anyway) " Right there, that’s a fucking textbook example of “I’m putting my own, worst possible, spin on it, because I don’t like the guy” Your link to Cecil’s column said that it was nonesense, yet you keep shoveling the same shit and then responding with a big old Vinnie Barbarino “Wha?” grin!
So much so that I voted for Kerry. How stupid do you have to be to ignore, for the fourth time, that I am not talking about anyone’s war record? I don’t care! It’s a non issue, as was Clinton’s draft dodging when I voted for him in '96! Jesus, read for comprehension. will ya?
No, I think he just realized the futility of attempting to explain anything to someone with their eyes squinched shut screaming “LALALALALALALA!!!” at the top of their lungs…
Good, then I succeeded. Look, I don’t see how you really don’t get Michael Moore saying a statement such as ‘Iraqi fighters are comparable to American forefathers’ laughable as it may be, cannot be comparable to anything Ann Coutler has said.
You’re the one ignoring facts to grind your own political axe, as I’ve demonstrated. Even the link that you provided to bolster your case doesn’t say what you said it said, I suppose you’re not used to debating with people old enough to read. There’s a putz here, alright, but it ain’t me.
Oh, yeah. Your biting wit and incisive commentary has me all rattled. :rolleyes: You want to hit a mark, you have to have a couple of darts. You got jack-shit. You have no argument. You have no evidence. You have no perspective. You’re an idiot with an opinion and delusions of relevance.
Is it comparable to anything Coulter has said? Yes. Not everything she has said has been an endorsement of genocide and gun-barrel group-think. Is it comparable to the worst things Coulter has said? Not even remotely. Which, for the terminally slow of thinking (that means you, Ryan) is the point of this discussion.
