Oh yeah, I didn’t think of that. But then how could they know he was a troll so fast? :dubious:
Wow, the mysteries of this place!
Oh yeah, I didn’t think of that. But then how could they know he was a troll so fast? :dubious:
Wow, the mysteries of this place!
Then I dare you to engage in one having to do with Christianity, you know-it-all bitch. Pick the topic, though I can’t and won’t speak for him, I’m fairly sure he’ll engage…and strip your panties off.
Guy knows what he speaks of, take him for a spin and you’ll see.
Fuck this pile-on!
Off the meds today, dearie? :rolleyes: I’ve read what he writes; it’s so poorly-written and so lacking in supporting evidence that it’s not worth my time to reply. Or, rather, I replied for a bit until I realized the utter pointlessness of doing so.
I’d love to see some religious discussions without him, for a change. He seems to be channelling a recently-departed poster who made as little sense.
Now run along and ask mommy for your pills like a good boy.
Off the meds today, dearie? :rolleyes: I’ve read what he writes; it’s so poorly-written and so lacking in supporting evidence that it’s not worth my time to reply. Or, rather, I replied for a bit until I realized the utter pointlessness of doing so.
I’d love to see some religious discussions without him, for a change. He seems to be channelling a recently-departed poster who made as little sense.
Now run along and ask mommy for your pills like a good boy.
I won’t ask you to blow me as I’m not fond of skanks. Having said that, instead of beating around the bush, why don’t you take me up on my dare? Not usually a betting man, but I’m willing to wager a hundred bucks* that he’ll butcher you on a one on one debate.
*Terms to be agreed on and, of course, the SDMB allowing such a debate.
As for “meds,” that reminds me, I have a query in mind. What’s good for a permanent PMS condition? 'cause you need a double helping of whatever it is.
Cheers, dearie. Or “condescending bitch” whichever you prefer.
Enjoy.
And I never said you did and you are trying to. . .what is that word?. . . oh, yeah!..weasel out of your statement.
You said that a disproportionate number of those who disparage you were, by your lights, irrational. I am not challenging your belief that theists are irrational. I am pointing out that you have lied, because any survey of the two threads in which you have attempted to Pit me will show that the proportions, between believers and non-believers, of those who have disparaged you are not skewed for this board. You have evoked the opprobrium of theists and atheists pretty much proportionally in these threads, making your “disproportionate” claim a lie.
Tom with the gloves off in the** Pit** Who’da thunk it?
Then I dare you to engage in one having to do with Christianity, you know-it-all bitch. Pick the topic, though I can’t and won’t speak for him, I’m fairly sure he’ll engage…and strip your panties off.
Guy knows what he speaks of, take him for a spin and you’ll see.
Fuck this pile-on!
Been there done that…still got my panties…
they’re nice… got flowers on em
Been there done that…still got my panties…
they’re nice… got flowers on em
Yeah, sure. But no doubt those are your second pair for everybody knows that women always wear their lacy, see-through g-strings first.
BTW, I always though you were a guy due to youur user name = cosmoDAN. Dan being as in Daniel.
Anyway, I like your posting style as I think you’re rather fair and not overly zealous in your beliefs. Knowing you’re a gal only make them that much better. Sexism? Naaw, I love everyone – almost. Just don’t ask Quiddity and/or any of the tightie righties – but I have a special fondness for the opposite sex. Birth defect perhaps.
Keep on keeping on. All the best.
Yeah, sure. But no doubt those are your second pair for everybody knows that women always wear their lacy, see-through g-strings first.
BTW, I always though you were a guy due to youur user name = cosmoDAN. Dan being as in Daniel.
Anyway, I like your posting style as I think you’re rather fair and not overly zealous in your beliefs. Knowing you’re a gal only make them that much better. Sexism? Naaw, I love everyone – almost. Just don’t ask Quiddity and/or any of the tightie righties – but I have a special fondness for the opposite sex. Birth defect perhaps.
Keep on keeping on. All the best.
Well you first thought was right. I **am ** a guy.
That doesn’t mean I can’t enjoy some nice panties.
I suppose that means you won’t flirt with me anymore?
Well you first thought was right. I **am ** a guy.
That doesn’t mean I can’t enjoy some nice panties.
I suppose that means you won’t flirt with me anymore?
** not** good haiku
I won’t ask you to blow me as I’m not fond of skanks. Having said that, instead of beating around the bush, why don’t you take me up on my dare? Not usually a betting man, but I’m willing to wager a hundred bucks* that he’ll butcher you on a one on one debate.
*Terms to be agreed on and, of course, the SDMB allowing such a debate.
As for “meds,” that reminds me, I have a query in mind. What’s good for a permanent PMS condition? 'cause you need a double helping of whatever it is.
Cheers, dearie. Or “condescending bitch” whichever you prefer.
Enjoy.
See now, if you could just pay attention for a sec, you’d see that I said I, like cosmodan, have
Been there done that…still got my panties…
they’re nice… got flowers on em
. Except not flowers today. You go have a little lookie in one of your best buddy’s threads and you’ll see I gave it a whack and found it decidedly unsatisfactory.
He’s not that good a debater. I’ve seen you do much better. Don’t know why you have such a hardon for him but hey, whatever floats your boat, babe
badchad: Also I would like add that those who are describing my behavior as all that stuff, come from a group from whom a disproportionate number who are “self admittedly” (as that term is being used most frequently at this time) irrational.
badchad: I would think you could read them with more precision.
Reread the first sentence aloud carefully. It is a good example of why it is sometimes difficult to read your posts and understand precisely what you mean.
If you are suggesting that a disproportionate number of the posters who are critical of you have “self-admitted” (your term) to being irrational, I would like cites please. That’s a very specific claim.
Keep in mind that I’m not here to debate irrationalism with you. I just want to see the evidence that you claim exists.
I just want to see the evidence that you claim exists.
Good luck with that. RedFury, old buddy, you might want to watch what happens here. You’ll see that the result will be zip because it’s yet another badchad statement lacking any sort of actual data to back it up.
Now you may think debating someone who pulls statements like that out of his butt ‘challenging’ or in some way entertaining. I think it’s tiresome which is why I can’t be bothered.
Guys, it’s C-O-S-M-O-S-D-A-N.
It has an S in it.
He is of the ethereal cosmos…(sound of stars flapping in the breeze)
He is not a round-headed cartoon character from the 1930s.
If I have made a mistake, I sorry.
Guys, it’s C-O-S-M-O-S-D-A-N.
It has an S in it.
He is of the ethereal cosmos…(sound of stars flapping in the breeze)
He is not a round-headed cartoon character from the 1930s.
If I have made a mistake, I sorry.
Dang. :smack: Shows how you read expecting to see certain things and not others. You don’t see ‘sd’ together too often.
Well you first thought was right. I **am ** a guy.
That doesn’t mean I can’t enjoy some nice panties.
I suppose that means you won’t flirt with me anymore?
Aaaaaahahahahahaahahaa! :: Snerk :
Blank
Then I dare you to engage in one having to do with Christianity, you know-it-all bitch. Pick the topic, though I can’t and won’t speak for him, I’m fairly sure he’ll engage…and strip your panties off.
Guy knows what he speaks of, take him for a spin and you’ll see.
All he does is fling shit and quote the Bible out of context. Sure, many times the shit flinging does cause his “opponent” to “give up” but I also often walk away from shit-slinging monkeys. They do jump up and down real nice and think that they have won. And, the shit-slingers little primate buddies also think that the shit-slinger has won and make the appropriate monkey noises. You know, I think I hear some of them now.
Well you first thought was right. I **am ** a guy.
My divine instincts rarely let me down.
That doesn’t mean I can’t enjoy some nice panties.
Indeed, it doesn’t. OTOH, it’s a bit of TMI for my taste. I guess next you’ll be telling us how you type one-handed and why. And yes, that is a rhetorical question.
I suppose that means you won’t flirt with me anymore?
For once we agree on something.
See now, if you could just pay attention for a sec, you’d see that I said I, like cosmodan, have . Except not flowers today. You go have a little lookie in one of your best buddy’s threads and you’ll see I gave it a whack and found it decidedly unsatisfactory.
Cite that you said as much in this thread. Besides, the fact that you found the experience “unsatisfactory” means diddly-squat in the outcome of a debate. Usually means you got yout ass handed to you anyway.
Besides, seeing your own, rather limited, debating skills in your last two Pit train-wrecks left me rather unimpressed.
He’s not that good a debater. I’ve seen you do much better. Don’t know why you have such a hardon for him but hey, whatever floats your boat, babe
He sure beats the shit outta of anything you’ve shown yourself.
As for my “hard-ons,” that is a topic I don’t discuss in public. But if you must know, hairy asses and dicks don’t quite do it for my libido. And I need not put in any sort of disclaimer about being a homophobe here as my record on said issue stands on its own merit on this board.
I simply don’t care who puts what in where.
TTFN.
PS-Thanks for the complement on my own debating skills although I don’t quite agree. I’m simply bulldoggish and fact-based. Which easily tears most conservatives’ bubble world to shreds. Guess it’s my own little niche on this board.
Aaaaaahahahahahaahahaa! :: Snerk :
Let me guess, your funny-bone is your coccyx. Which only serves to explain why you can be such an a-hole and so easily entertained.
DrDeth,
So you say. And if you’re so convinced why don’t you “destroy” him in debate? Even if I have no idea how that can be done without a iota of empirical evidence for a supernatural deity – quite the contrary in fact.
“Godidit” seems to losing steam to science almost daily.
Have fun. Like Jodi.
I’m simply bulldoggish and fact-based.
Then why the slavish fandom of badchad who is assuredly the former but rarely, if ever, the latter. Really. Watch how he answers Zoe. He’s been challenged to back up his statement. As usual, he won’t because he can’t. If you have such a great respect for facts, then you need to be on the other side of this discussion because your buddy does not.
DrDeth,
So you say. And if you’re so convinced why don’t you “destroy” him in debate? Even if I have no idea how that can be done without a iota of empirical evidence for a supernatural deity – quite the contrary in fact.
“I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it.” GBS
Besides, I have serious doubts myself.
But I would happily engage him in a real debate, on a real subject. However he’ll just fling shit and make monkey noises like he won. He has never debated yet on these boards. “Ook, ook” Splat.
If you have doubts about my debating ability, see my many debates with my learned and esteemed opponent Diogenes the Cynic. Now, there’s a doubter with some real fucking cites and some fucking facts. He’s worth debating- smart, intelligent, and never given to shit flinging. He is more learned that I am, but I am better at citing so we’re about even.