No.
There are some things for which the answer would be yes, but not all things. Medically-related important things would be ‘no.’
So overall, the answer is no.
No.
There are some things for which the answer would be yes, but not all things. Medically-related important things would be ‘no.’
So overall, the answer is no.
No.
No. The police can assume that another professional badged public service dept of the same city will handle their job and the police will have access to their reports.
You batting average continues the same, note.
You know, you can just say “I don’t think Zimmerman was all that badly injured at all, he didn’t fear for his life, thus he had no reason to use deadly force”. Perfectly fine opinion. Trying to read something into what’s missing when you have no idea of what legally should be/ can be/ or needs to be there is not. Give it up. The fact that the police didn’t say anything about the injuries is not meaningful.
(damn it, bricker beat me to it. Not only smart, but fast. Darn him to heck)
What’s your point? That it is speculation? Well sure, this is “IN My Humble Opinion” after all, and INMHO the beatdown Zimmerman’s supporters claim he got does not seem to jibe with the evidence.
Sure, these are not mutually exclusive. I personally however, do not think it was faked or incomplete, I am concerned about the thoroughness of it, but that may be unfounded.
Gangster Octopus you said
to Terr’s mention he/she doesn’t understand as to why some are stuck on your question: "If the answer is yes then would it be safe to assume that Zimmerman showed no signs of brain injury to the police that would merit such an insistence. "
So, it’s not us about speculation, it’s about something that has no real bearing on the actual issue (although, I guess if there was a clear brain injury we wouldn’t be talking here). No one is claiming there was a significant brain injury. There were wounds-or not whichever camp you’re in. If there were wounds, they are mentioned in the police report and presumably the SFD report. But there is no duty for the police to document a declination of medical attention/EMS transport. There was a duty by the SFD. So, if that matters to you, we’ll find it there–when it is released.
No need to give your HO on this issue. Any HO as to a duty on the part of the police to include information about a declination of EMS transport does not even live up to a civil standard of giving a crap. It’s straw grasping.
So - if you don’t think it was faked, does that mean you do think Zimmerman was injured - bloody nose and back of head?
I noticed this little blurb about Zimmerman’s clothes:
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/28/2717866/tough-minded-prosecutor-in-spotlight.html
Is it possible they took his clothes into evidence? SYG may prevent an immediate arrest, but they could get his clothes, with a search warrant if necessary, couldn’t they?
That appears to be the generally accepted hypothesis, from all I’ve read; but here at Booman Tribune you’ll find Booman quoting and analyzing witnesses’ statements and arriving at to this scenario:
Except:
There was an eyewitness who saw Martin on top of Zimmerman.
If Zimmerman shot Martin while Zimmerman was sitting on him, then either
a. Martin would be shot in the back, or
b. his body would be on its back.
Neither of which is true.
At least one witness is reported as saying the person in red was on the bottom of the scuffle. Zimmerman was wearing red. Of course, Zimmerman may have changed clothes, since there are shouts that there are no blood stains on the red shirt as seen in the grainy video.
SO WHY NOT WAIT FOR THE STATEMENTS THAT WERE TAKEN BEFORE SIGNIFICANT SECONDARY MOTIVES AND JUST GENERAL NORMAL WITNESS BEHAVIOR HAD AN EFFECT ON THE WITNESSES’ TESTIMONY?!
Insert rationale here as to police “correction” of witness testimony.
Yes, that is certainly a unbiased account, espcially the "And then he was executed. " part. :rolleyes::dubious:
Please point out where I said it was unbiased. Or anything else other than it was one hypothesis currently being offered.
I don’t think the report is “faked”. I’m taking it at face value. And when I do that, I see no evidence that Zimmerman, only minutes before, had experienced blunt force trauma to the head.
I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect to see such evidence in a police report when that little detail is central to Zimmerman’s account. In fact, I think it’s unreasonable to not expect it.
You didn’t. But the writer thinks it was. However, it’s biased on so many levels, it’s worthless.
As I said I am trying to get to how reliable Zimmerman’s public defenders are, such as Zimmerman’s brother who said on Piers Morgan:
“Swing and a miss!”
You read the police report? So you saw where Officer Smith says “Zimmerman was bleeding from the nose and back of his head…Zimmerman was given first aid by the SFD [while in the backseat of the police car.” So, do you just dismiss this? It is some evidence of an injury. If it’s not corroborated by the SFD, I’ll look at it with a jaundiced eye. How are you not being a super-sleuth without all, or most of, the facts?
As for reasonableness in not documenting a need to go to the ER in the police report, you are presuming that the injuries should have necessitated such a need and that it’s not enough for just the SFD to document it. Your reasonableness standard would not even survive a summary judgment. Truly. And you’re ignoring both Bricker and I telling you it’s not something included in police reports. Again, of those 400 reports, all of them included injuries and involved me observing all later medical records as to the injury. About 30 of those 400 included injuries where the EMS recommended an ER trip to the hospital–but only two included police mention of it–one was under ridiculous circumstances.
Frankly, on this issue, you’re not even close to reasonable.
Zimmerman’s attorney said that Zimmerman went for medical treatment the next day. Couldn’t those records be released be released if Zimmerman requested them?
No, George Zimmerman’s brothersaid his head had been smashed on the sidewalk so many times, if he had been hit one more time, he would be “wearing diapers for the rest of his life and being spoon-fed by his brother.”
You seem to be paraphrasing here:
He doesn’t say anything about his head being smashed into the sidewalk multiple times. He is saying if George got his head smashed more times into the sidewalk it would be bad. I can agree to that.