Not yet. But as John keep playing the bongoes on that “Report” button, they’ll have no option but to admonish me for trolling.
I never believed in magic, or transmogrification. Sure, I’d heard the odd report of a witch turning a man into a newt (I understand he got better), but I didn’t believe until now. I just witnessed John turn a pseudotriton into a mustella!
How would you know what’s been going on in this thread? I thought "This is a waste of time. I’d sooner visit the Argument Clinic. " Now it’s worthy of reading again? We were doing so well with you gone, Truman, too. Did that nasty old door hurt your butt as you were leaving?
Links and spelling correction mine.
“Hyperbole!” Surely you recognize it…
How 'bout now?
There are people out there who are paid to sign up to websites like this one to try to foment argument and raise doubts about left/right candidates. They actually hire people who have no political convictions of any strength, and train them to present contrary opinion. Perhaps OMG is one of them, and that’s why he doesn’t come across as all that sincere.
It’s spelled “hypocrisy,” btw. Take a principled stand and leave, or answer my questions and stay. What do you mean by “it”?, for starters.
Well, shoot – most of us been annoying people here for free! Where do we sign up to make some pocket change?
You really do identify with The Donald, don’t you? Am I fired? Is that what the whole thing with ‘the door hitting you’ about, trying to see if a new catchphrase will take hold?
Which “it” do you want me to clarify?
I don’t think you get to pontificate about hypocrisy after weaseling out on Mace that way…
How many people are supporting your pitting of OMG, btw? Going well, is it?
People sometimes ask me why I don’t care to engage in political discussions. It’s largely because I’d have to interact with the kind of people who like to engage in political discussions.
You really are a stupid little turd, aren’t you? I’ll print your moronic nonsensical sentence for you with the key words REAL big so you can’t mistake them (although I don’t really like speculating about what’s too obvious for you to miss):
[QUOTE=you, dumbass]
If over 50% of the readers of this OP tell you “you are wrong, it doesn’t mean what you think it means, you are full of shit, your conclusions about OMG are unwarranted, and you are a doofus”, will you stop the inanity?
[/QUOTE]
Cite?
Such namecalling. I mean, I know we’re in the Pit and all, but I keep hoping you’ll offer some small evidence of wit, or logic, or something. It’s your OP, you should at least try, don’t you think?
To answer your question, the “it”, which seemed evident to me from the context, is “OMG’s refusal to accept your bet”. His refusal doesn’t prove your thesis that this proves he is a troll, any more than Trump’s offer to Obama, which Obama ignored, proved Trump’s thesis that Obama *is therefore *a foreign citizen/fraud/poor student/whatever Trump could fling against the wall. Other, plausible, reasons for OMG’s declining, (including OMG himself, of course) were offered by various posters.
If your opinion cannot be disproven/falsified, as you posited in an above thread, does that suggest that all opinions are equally valid, including Trump’s opinion of Obama, and yours of OMG’s being a troll? If not, why not?
BTW, have you noticed that the majority of posters to this thread don’t seem to agree with your assertion? (My general impression, I haven’t kept a running tally). What, if anything, do you make of that?
I do withdraw my earlier observation that this thread was a waste of time. It is, at least for the moment, somewhat entertaining.
What, you mean like “you’re full of shit” or “you’re a doofus”? You’re too much of a sanctimonious (look it up) little lump of fecal matter for me to argue with further. You were making more of a contribution when he took yourself out of here. Do it again, would you? You were at your best when you were gone.
The really sad part, I think, is you are taking offense to my post, which was a hypothetical (look it up). I wasn’t calling you names, I was asking you a question, to wit, if a lot of posters respond to your OP with disagreement, would it have any impact upon your opinion? I really wasn’t trying to insult you, just disagreeing. I’m sorry if my vocabulary offended you, that actually, truly wasn’t my intent.
How about you try to answer my questions? I’m actually being pretty civil, I think. You’re the one who has to resort to name-calling (troll, turd, sanctimonious, etc) and great big lettering. Really, can’t you express yourself, or respond to ideas, any better than that?
That’s just one of the many, many things you are wrong about. Just one.
Actually, it was quite a long post on another website by someone who claims to do just that. It’s hardly out of the realm of possibility, but no hard cite. I would think they wouldn’t exactly advertise too loudly.
Then you should mosey over to the predictions thread linked above and explain your reasoning. Otherwise, OMG will be able to point at you and laugh after the election. Not that there’s anything wrong with that…
Well, he seems to have admitted creating a bullshit thread in the Elections forum.
To be clear, I think it is valid and useful to ask somebody whether they would put their money or rep where their mouth is. But I also think prr is stepping all over my point: pretending that his sig offer is of overwhelmingly important significance places the honorable avocation of odds setting in an unflattering light. He should concede that those with a fractured and powdered reputation have an advantage over those with a remotely typical sense of dignity.
And where am I doing that? I’m humbly admitting that this bet is very small potatoes. We’re betting something of almost no significance–a sig line? For a limited period? Realy? That’s your idea of “overwhelmingly important significance”?–and my point is that OMG ABC refuses to do it, despite blustering that “Obama is toast.” I find that despicably weak and lame.