Adele is a nice girl who writes catchy tunes about her boyfriends – it’s ideal, with all due respect, sentimental pap ideal for the US market.
Looking at other contemporaries of hers just from London, Adele can’t sing as well as Leona Lewis, she doesn’t write as interestingly as Florence, she has none of the political nous of Jesse J and she will never, ever develop the phrasing or the general musicality of Amy Winehouse. Apart from that, she an alright bird.
This article by Greg Kot from the Chicago Tribune gives some good insight on this, I believe. He’s not wild about “21” as a whole, but he praises “Rolling in the Deep” highly, and spells out the elements that make it as good as it is.
The secret of Adele’s success is that she has a wonderful voice. That’s all. Her singing is simply so amazing that she doesn’t need autotune or a great body.
I’m rather surprised the OP thinks a lack of Auto-Tune would be a drawback for a singer who can actually hit the notes on her own. Maybe I’m out of touch, but I thought Auto-Tune was a means to an end and not something that attracted music listeners in and of itself.
No, it’s a selling point. People who have no need of auto-tune (Rhianna, Christina A., Bruno Mars. . . too many to mention, really) use it all the time now. It’s expected.
I’m always amazed by how often the phrase “with all due respect” is followed by something that is disrespectful. I first heard Adele’s “Rolling in the Deep” on Dutch radio. Adele appears to be popular in Great Britain, the United States, Canada and parts of mainland Europe. So her “sentimental pap” seems ideal for all sorts of different places.
Of course she deserves respect - due respect - which is exactly what I did “Adele is a nice girl who writes catchy tunes about her boyfriends”. Nor is that faint priase, it’s my honest judgement.
She is really not all that. She is, however, flavour of the month/year, in a poor year.
As mentioned upo thread, there really are 4-5 contemporary female Londoners who are more interestting.
You’re kind of missing the point; Adele can connect with her audience based on the quality of her voice and how it fits in the songs she sings. Snobbishly breaking down her attributes and dismissing them misses the fact that what she does works. And given that it is grounded on straight-up singing and straightforward songs, she feels easy to root for.
Well you know what, I was sitting on my balcony today and the neighbours had a radio on, and I heard this amazing, soulful voice singing a really gripping tune that I’d never heard before. Strained my ears to hear some words so I could google it. Guess who it was? The song was Rolling in the Deep.
this,
So very rarely does contemporary music grab me by the nuts but Adele certainly does.
I’m sure there are technically better singers out there.
I’m sure there are better songwriters.
I’m sure there are people with better stagecraft, who can dance better and look more beautiful. All that is incidental.
Adele is greater than the sum of her parts. It is obvious even to such an old fart such as myself that she believes and cares deeply about every word she writes and sings and she has talent enough to get that across to an audience.
Like jjimm, I overheard “Rolling in the Deep” on the radio and had to Spotify, Google to find out who it was. The last time I did that was when I first heard Spoon’s “Don’t You Evah.”
So if you saw the Grammys, you saw one side of what is popular music today. Perry, Minaj… sort of identikit pop stars, who you know won’t be remembered in 5 years. Hell, maybe even 2. Even Gaga’s flash is fading.
Adele is a real musician, with a real voice. She has staying power. And that’s from someone who isn’t a particular fan of the genre (Winehouse, Duffy, et al are fine but I’m not salivating over blue-eyed soul - Dusty Springfield did that oh-so-well so long ago). She’s credible, which is more than 95% of artists on the radio. They’re given a sheet of lyrics, a dance routine, and that’s their art. I see Adele as the complete opposite.