Yes, at least in terms of adult responsibility. The law is wrong.
Some kids need to be housed and counselled away from other people, but I do not agree that kids should be tried as adults or held to the same level of accountability.
It is a fact that they don’t have the same level of understanding as an adult. That doesn’t mean they can’t be dangerous or that they shouldn’t be isolated away from society in some cases.
If she is under 16, she doesn’t look 21, and she isn’t capable of giving consent no matter how many fake iD’s she has. We also know that fake ID’s are easy to get, so it’s disingenuous for any guy to try to argue that they are a reliable way to check a girl’s age.
I want you to come out and say it. You think everyone is lying and everyone is wrong in this thread and you are the only one telling the truth and knows what is right.
I’m on the fence, but I’ll answer 15. I agree with the physiological reasons on someone at the age of 15 is not entirely developed yet. It is possible (hell, I say likely) that at 15 a girl can be obsessed by sex and the curiosity of it which could lead her sexual abuse.
At 16, you’re on your own.
One question, Dio. In the hypothetical example from Laudenum, yes, the law agrees with you (and myself too) that this scenario is statutory rape. But does the hypothetical man (who checked her ID, had conversation with, etc.) deserve to be on a sexual offender list?
I say a big NO to that. I think it is necessary to draw a line on when it’s legally kosher to have sex, but you can’t blanket each sexual related “crime”.
The word “wrong” doesn’t mean anything. She’s too young to comprehend the long range consequences of actions, and she hasn’t developed the same impulse control as an adult yet.
This is fucking ridiculous. You think a guy should be able to try to convince a jury that a FIVE year old looked like an adult?
What questions haven’t I answered?
She would not look 21, nor would she have the ID to prove it, but just for the sake of argument, I don’t care. The guy still raped a child. The liability is all his. I say give him life without parole and chemical castration. I’m not kidding.
How about just not sticking your dick in it? here are plenty of grown ups out ther. Fuck one of them instead of trying to finagle loopholes for jailbait.
I actually don’t think that sex offender lists are very useful or productive in any case. I don’t think they should exist at all, except in a confidential data base for law enforcement.
They can also play it safe just by actually knowing who a person really is before they have sex with her. If she’s young enough BE 15, she’s young enough to send somen kind of warning bells. Guys know that random pickups in bars are going to carry that particular risk, and it’s not a risk they have to take.
What underage were you when some adult sodomized you with that stick thats still shoved up your ass?
That you can’t accept even the remotest possibilty that there might be some gray area here, even if it is in the minority of cases, really makes you look like a fool.