Is it a mutation that makes so many of them mimes?
He met with Gustaf Philip Creutz, but he was not a real Swede, he was born in Finland! The Finns have a completely different genetic makeup than Germanics.
Did once, maybe. Come on! Europe has been enduring conquering armies and barbarian migrations and more conquering armies for centuries now, all the populations just sloshing back and forth. And you are descended from Vikings who raided all lands they could reach and brought home women as slave-concubines but raised the children as their own. You’re all mongrels now. I daresay not even the Icelanders are quite pureblood anything. There’s bound to be a Finn or a Saxon or an Irishwoman in the woodpile.
Funny, I hear this argument a lot in England too. And yet it’s rarely supported by any evidence, no matter what the Daily Mail and the Daily Mirror may try to convince us. Immigrants usually want to work.
I attribute that to genetic damage from absinthe.
No, he was a real Swede, and born in Sweden. (Most of what is now Finland was part of Sweden at that time – later it became part of Russia, and still later became independent Finland.)
The sentence about Finns and Swedes having “completely different genetic makeup” is, of course, complete nonsense.
Yes, but if they fail to find work, there will be no worries. If they had “fled” to the US instead, they would have to live on food stamps.
Those who are highly educated chose USA, others chose Northern Europe. Kind of rational when you think about it.
And if they fled to Antarctica, they’d be cold.
You said they came to Sweden to get money and benefits for nothing. I said they came to work. Since you’ve conceded the point to me, the rest of it is irrelevant - especially considering that there are a lot of illegal immigrants who go to America as well, which makes your argument irrelevant AND wrong.
And yet immigrants want to come here anyway. Even if they expect nothing but what they can make from day-jobs picked up in the parking lot at Home Depot. (Nobody sneaks across the border for food stamps.)
Cite?
I have a challenge for you, Raleigh: Get all your Swedish Democrat friends together and show them this thread. Make them read the whole thing and discuss. Then tell us what happened.
He is still a Finn and not a Swede. Just like a Native-American is not a Euro-American.
Ideas Are Immortal - Big Think (I googled and found this, look at the self explainable picture)
Wow, where do you get this stuff? It’s not even true.
You claim to have been to England many times and claim to be Swedish but the rest of your post means you were hallucinating a bunch of blond people or you are not being truthful. You’d have to stretch the definition of “blond” beyond its breaking point for it to be remotely true. Sure, there are blond people, but the English countryside isn’t just some large fanciful colony of Aryan stereotypes.
Though, I suppose the English could just be hiding their racially superior blond stereotypes from prying eyes. Can’t be too careful with your “good” genetic stock, after all.
I am talking about people who pretend to be refugees. Not labor migrants. The refugees choose Sweden because if they don’t get work, they get money and benefits for nothing. So my argument is not irrelevant or wrong at all.
You just need common sense to realize this, making your ability to understand it non-existent.
Anyway, the British are descended from Saxons and Normans and Romans (and whatever slaves and auxiliaries the Romans brought with them) and Celts and whoever was living there before the Celts arrived. With a sprinkling of Danes, and Carthaginians, and Gypsies, and stranded Spanish sailors from the Armada (“Lascars”). All mongrels.
My point was that Swedes are not as blond as people might think, just as amanset has noticed too. No reason for you to get upset about it.
First, Swedes are an example of a non-swarthy people evidenced by plentiful lusty blond haired, blue eyed demigods.
Now, they “are not as blond as people might think”.
Don’t you mean “not as blond as I claimed several times previously in this thread”?
You were challenged several times on Swedish genetic gifts - actually you’ve claimed genetic superiority. It’s pretty much only you who’s claimed Swedes are that blond.
Get some consistency or at least stand up for the courage of your convictions.
Swedes are blonder than all the other Northern Europeans. But if you go to Sweden, you will notice that the difference is not that big, especially since we have been flooded by the hords of the third world. I have traditional Swedish looks and thus claim superiority to you.
Lascars weren’t stranded Spanish sailors.
Translation: Swedes are blonder. But they are not really blonder except in the narrative I’ve created for myself.
See post above RE: consistency.
Wait. Refugees?
I need a line judge call - how far was that goalpost just moved?