I understood your point. I was just clarifying my response that got garbled in translation.
You have completely missed out the key issues of my OP.
Were you taught that Slavery was primarily an all white-affair?
Were you taught that Nazi-Germany is a natural result of white nationalism?
Were you taught to embrace mass immigration?
Were you taught that if you don’t like immigration, you are a racist/xenophobe?
I would also like to ask Spectre, towndebb and John Mace: Did you learn about the British Concentration Camps in Primary School or High School?
Do you have a cite for this? I’m trying to find one but:
“four major ‘outliers’- Basques, Lapps, Finns and Icelanders; a result he attributed to their relative isolation”
“Finland, showing the greatest distance to the rest of Europeans.”
And scrolling down to the table, sure the diffrence between swedes and finns are the smallest one in the row containing the finns but its still distinctively larger than say the swedish-german one.
The Greeks, Yugoslavs and Turks immigrated already in the 50s. Many of them had children with Swedish women. Today there are about 2 million people with an immigrant background in Sweden. Swedes of today are just not as blonde as they used to be. That is a fact. But I give you my Scandinavian word to never again speak about “hordes from the…”
I don’t understand how the British Boer concentration camps are so important to this discussion. The British are Northern Europeans, aren’t they?
In Sweden if you are a labour migrant, you must have your job ready before you enter the country. So I was kind of taking it for granted that we were talking “refugees”.
I’m really sorry to have to tell you but sweden was never that blond.
Heres a picture from 1950’s gothenburg. (you can see the skansen lejonet in the background)
That is just not true Sherwood. Check this image: Ideas Are Immortal - Big Think
Another fact that is always forgotten is that many more Black South Africans then Afrikaners were interned in these concentration camps; their camp numbers (and deaths) are frequently left out of the tally.
[
](BBC News | AFRICA | Forgotten victims of the Boer War)[
](Second Boer War - Wikipedia)[
](http://www.anglo-boer.co.za/concentration-camps/black-camps.php)
As were the Boers. I really doubt that shameful little episode is part of the Swedish curriculum. In fact, I wonder what the Swedes teach about the later war–when concentration camps spawned labor camps & extermination camps. While Sweden remained neutral.
In Texas, we didn’t learn much about The Boer War. (Ask me about The Alamo!) But most of us learned to read & some of us even kept learning after 12th grade.
ETA: Orcenio pointed out that many more victims of the First Concentration Camps were black. A fact I’m sure RR would applaud!
How much do you remember?
So you want them to become farmers like the Swedes in Minnesota? Bad news for you: There is no fertile land left in Sweden! Try to understand that you can not compare today’s immigration with the migration to America in the 19th century.
Yes you are right. There are nothing but farmers currently in southern Sweden, so anyone going to live there would have no option but to be a farmer.
Just because I do not like to become a minority in my own country, you presume that I like Blacks to die… You must be really sick. I hope the moderators will ban you on the spot or at least give you a warning.:mad:
There isn’t? were using 2.7M hectares of areable land atm, in the 40s we were using 4.6.
Thats a lot of land thats not beeing used for growing food (I suspect a lot of it has been turned into urban areas but hardly all of it)
and theres 23M hectares of forest. I’m sure some of it could be made into areable land.
No.
I was taught that slavery had been around for a long, long time, and that at different times in history different groups had held other groups captive as slaves. Biblical times? The Jews slaving away under the Egyptians. America ca. 1850? Black people slaving away under white people. Present-day? Black people slaving away under other black people. (Oversimplified? Yes, of course – I’m talking early childhood here.)
If you meant to say white supremacism, I was certainly taught that it was a pretty big deal in Hitler’s Germany and indeed an integral part of the National Socialist ideology. Don’t know about Nazi Germany being its “natural result”, though… I can’t recall my teachers ever framing it like that.
Later on I learned about sky-rocketing inflation and unemployment during the Weimar Republic, though, and assumed that must have played a big role in Hitler’s rise to power, too. Can’t remember if I picked that up in school, or during my own reading. Oh well.
Don’t know about “mass” immigration, but I was definitely taught that immigration was a pretty awesome thing.
After all, it gave Sweden that smokin’ hot Kurdish girl who did all the sexy dancing in the E-Type music videos. Ah, yes. Even after all these years, I sure wouldn’t mind “embracing” her “mass immigration.”
In all seriousness, though, I was more or less taught that immigration was great and would benefit Sweden in many different ways.
Pretty much, yes, or at least that if you don’t like immigrants, no matter who they are or how they live their lives, you are indeed a racist/xenophobe.
RR’s history guru Pat Buchanan has a hard-on against the British for some reason. According to Pat, the British started WW2, they made the Holocaust happen, and well even if they didn’t they invented concentration camps, so who are we to point fingers at the poor Germans?
From: Lascar - Wikipedia
As far as I know, despite the legends, Spanish Armada survivors left no significant genetic legacy on these islands.
People tend to perceive the World through the media.:rolleyes:
America and Australia have also had experiences with colonizing influences (those self-same “Northern” Europeans at work, actually). But that doesn’t stop them from changing their ethnic makeup by mass immigration.
Non-Jews can not easily migrate to Israel. They even try to get rid of non-Jews just to preserve their “Jewish identity”:
Israeli politics and world diplomacy | The Jerusalem Post
Once again Sherwood, your ignorance is hurting your argument.
I hope you notice that the same image shows that the Poles and Czechs (apparently NOT among the “Northern” Europeans in your typography) are more closely related to the Swedes than the English and southern Germans.
Is that really what you want to claim? If so, you yourself have presented evidence contrary to your previous assertions.
As for Finns/Swedes, I’m started to look through sources. I admit it’s possible I was thinking of the native Lapp (Sami?) population.
Even so, if the Finns are the genetically isolated ones, that means they’re the isolated ones and the Swedes have seen more mixing with the general European population.
Either way, it still puts a bit of a hole in the “Sweden as genetically isolated” theory.