I want to preserve my cultural heritage too. My culture has produced some great things, and I like it. The world is richer for having my culture in it.
That’s an entirely independent proposition from my attitudes about other cultures, which I also enjoy and appreciate and want to have around. My own life is richer in a more multicultural society.
There need be no conflict between valuing one culture, and valuing and welcoming others.
I’m not an expert on the Dalai Lama and I don’t follow ever last thing he’s ever said, so I’m open to being corrected on this point. But have never heard the Dalai Lama suggest that he has the right to tell the Chinese to live or not live in certain places or to practice or not engage any particular cultural practice.
So far as I know, all he asks are things such as that the Chinese do not oppress the Tibetans, that they don’t actively work to destroy Tibetan cultural institutions and practices, and that the allow Tibetans a degree of freedom and autonomy to choose for themselves how they want to live.
No country has a “right” to exist. I’d be happier if we had none. But it does exist, and is capable of enforcing the continuance of its existence, which is all that is required. Tibet, not so much.
And even if this “right” did exist, I don’t think any country *should *exist as an exclusive club for a particular ethnicity, so I’m not a fan of the Right of Return or any other ethnicity tests for immigration, no. I’m all for Israel as what it is, a modern democracy in an otherwise shitty neighbourhood, and I can sympathise with the reasoning for the RoR, but I don’t agree with it and I don’t think it is *essential *for the continued existence of Israel as a state.