Why Isn't the IRS Investigating the Clinton Foundation?

Not reading the dreck that the OP threw out there, but I will add this to the conversation. Before an e-mail is used as evidence, either for or against someone, it 's cyber-history should be looked at closely. Spoofing someone’s email account is so ridiculously easy to do, it basically means no single e-mail (or even a mass of e-mails) has any weight unless a complete forensic chain of custody can be established.

The problem with some (not all, but some) of the stuff coming out of WikiLeaks and similar sources, is that they don’t look very clean after going through a scrub. Many (again, not all, but many) show indications of being fabricated completely, tampered with or edited, or other subtle signs of manipulation.

Wait…we’re in the pit? Ahem. Fuck that sorry ass, weak ass evidence. That’s just fucking stupid!

[walter white]Tread lightly[/ww]

(my bolding)

Well, actually, regarding C: they did in fact do something worse. They nominated Trump.

Now I know this campaign has jumped the shark when Der Trihs is defending a Clinton. :eek:

Assuming there is actually any meat to any of this week’s Clinton scandals, you only have your own side to blame for nobody caring. Between Vince Foster, Benghazi, Clinton Foundation influence-peddling, the Wall Street speeches, and all the other non-stories that the GOP has been pushing for 20 years, it’s hardly any wonder nobody wants to sift through the bullshit to find the nugget of truth.

This will likely be of interest to you.

Well, well well. Welcome to the actual “ignore list!”

These Doper weeding threads are proving quite effective. :rolleyes:

Pointing out that the sky is blue(and crap is crap) is all it takes to get on your list?

Only a coward avoids uncomfortable discussion.

Stupid poster known for ignoring factual evidence and never answering anyone else’s legitimate questions about his posts is now putting people on ‘ignore’?

Oh precious.

At least we can agree on that, but I’m aftraid you’re still missing the point . You know - the REAL point that people you willfully ignore because they are so infatuated with Billary.

There, I said it: BILLARY!!!

Bwaaa, ha ha. :stuck_out_tongue:

Idiots.

Everybody close to that circle of aquaitances knows the email author well, his role in the scandal and what it really means to honest people who recognize the merit and evil it constitutes.

Alot of people including the reponders in this thread choose to remain willfully ignorant, struggling to disparage the facts with cognitive dissonance deviating from the REAL point. What was your point, again?

Is English not your first language, or is gish-gallop normally the way your brain works?

DING_DING_DING!! We have a winner: CORRECT RESPONSE.

Followed by cignitive dissonance.

The Clintons are anything but “run of the mill.” They epitomize the decline of American politics and decency in government, having built this reputation on a solid foundation of decades of white collar crime, enriching themselves at the expense of national security and undermining the whole concept of charitable organizations. The fact they are not in jail only underscore their success at pulling it off. So far.

It is so poetically appropriate the finger on the trigger of their own demise is none other than their daughter Chelsea. Can’t wait to hear her testify. It’ll be interesting to see whether or not she goes down right along with them.

Speaking of useful idiots. Although I’d question the “useful” part. :smiley:

Well, it was trenchant, concise, and pissy. Wait, “pithy”? No, right the first time…

Thanks for clearly demonstrating the most succinct example of willful ignorance I’ve seen so far today.

But it’s still early. :rolleyes:

Don’t be modest. You’re much better at it.

Are you mental?

It’s a little early early to assume anyone has “gotten away” with anything.

Oh absolutely. I am TERRIFIED of that bitch. More specifically, afraid for the course of national well-being should she win the election.

How many posters on your list so far, UA?