Not really, They are just more suspectible to pressuring by wealthy oil billionaires and heretical clergymen.
And it’s not like people just pulled this idea that Texas and other states want to secede. The governor of Texas has mentioned it, there were petitions to the Whitehouse to allow states to leave the union, and it’s not uncommon to see Confederate flags on display in the south.
I guess the onion was right:
http://www.theonion.com/articles/south-postpones-rising-again-for-yet-another-year,377/
A+
Right?
You tell 'em, ExTank!
And we wouldn’t be able to provide fuel for our vehicles or electricity for our homes, because we don’t have the infrastructure to manufacture and distribute those things, either. :rolleyes:
First, anybody (and I mean ANYBODY) can start a petition at the White House web page and get a few thousand signatures. I’ve done it myself. It means nothing. Heck, if ONE Southern crank started a secession petition, he could’ve gotten a few thousand signatures from Stephen Colbert viewers.
Second, Governor Rick Perry made ONE offhand comment about secession, at a partisan affair. Has he EVER mentioned it in front of the legislature? NO!
So you hold the anonymous users of a message board to a higher standard than the governor of Texas? We have to be careful with our comments, but he can throw out terms like secession and we’re all supposed to just roll with it?
Perry never used the term. His two remarks on the subject were:
And:
Lastly, Perry has been unequivocal that he doesn’t advocate secession.
:dubious: Did you see this in movie or do you speak from experience? I’m going to guess the former.
So Perry doesn’t support secession, but flirts with it to appease his ignorant base, but then when the rest of us say that Texas leaving is a fine idea, the people of Texas get all butthurt, got it. If they don’t want to be a laughing stock, they should stop doing ridiculous things and electing ridiculous represntatives.
You’re right, people that live and vote in political territories that elect idiots probably don’t have the right to argue over the factuality of anyone’s statements about that territory in a thread of a forum called Great Debate. They should humbly accept all statements made by others regardless of reality because they failed to convince the majority to not vote for idiots.
It’s almost like “Rick Perry” and “the people of Texas” are entirely distinct entities. Why should the people of Texas, or anywhere, roll over for people arguing that the union would be better off if their state were ejected from it? Because the governor of Texas made some veiled remarks to jab at Washington? That’s an absurd proposition.
Essentialism. Offered without further comment.
Which is why, if Texas were to secede, we would own the rest of the USA in short order.
And about 80 years later we created the United Nations, the United Nations charter and the US blessed it by signing it. Chapter 11 gives us that right.
One could make the same fairness argument about a president elected WITHOUT the majority of the vote. Apparently it’s perfectly fair to force shit down people’s throats.
Texas can secede if they want, but you should keep their barbecue.
Chapter 11 (Sections 73 and 74) of the Charter have nothing to do with Texas. Or any other state of the union. Texas has a “full measure of self-government” within the meaning of the Charter. <rolleyes>
I thought it was California trending on secession this time?
Nope. US can veto what it wishes at the UN. And the US has the bigger army. How many divisions does the UN have?