Time to kill…
I would. I thought the story plot was kinda intruiguing and damn cool - would’ve been cooler if Hollywood hadn’t gotten their grubby litte hands on it.
I remember that scene, how they used dogs to sniff out the real humans versus the machines. IIRC, SkyNet would want to have made them look different than the cookie-cutter Aaaaahnold types to keep them less than instantly identifiable.
Call me crazy.
Tripler
I’d like a naked Terminatrix too. Even if she killed me.
Since when? I pointed out to people after the second movie that the war couldn’t have been prevented, because Skynet devised the time machine that sent Reese back in time. If the war had been prevented, John Connor would have ceased to exist.
(And no pedants about how “but JC had already been born”, please; if it were the case that events that had already happened were immutable, there’d be no point sending the terminators back after the Connor family in the first place.)
XXX Sequel, XXX2 is being made.
But, guys…technically, wouldn’t a naked Terminatrix have to be fleshless?
And then how would you know?
The location of her input port. 
Thank you for that disturbing concept, Tuckerfan.
Well, I done been visited a website that clarified a few things. Naked Terminatrix now seems much more necessary to the plot.
Odd how these Terminators seem to keep getting more and more sophisticated, even though they’re sent back through time; you’d think Skynet would have sent back the most powerful one first. Awfully sporting of it, I say.
It’d be interesting if there was some kind of screwup and the next one sent back was actually a really early model, a T-12 or something. I envision it as being like the Robot from Lost in Space, but with miniguns instead of claws. Arnold could still do the voice! “Danger! Danger, John Connor!”
I thought that it was the SAME Arnold terminator, not a different one, but a reprogrammed one.
In the first one, they should have sent a whole bunch of people forward.
You mean as in “Pulling yourself up by your bootstraps”? I like it 
Another name for this is the Djinn Paradox. The classic example goes something like this: You’re walking down the street one day, when a temporal rift opens up and a watch falls out. You take the watch and use it. Years later, you become involved in time travel experiments. The scientists want to send a small object into the past to see if the technology works. You volunteer the watch, and it is sent into the past, where you find it and take it, and you wear it until you become involved in the experiments, when it gets sent into the past again, and so on.
Where did the watch come from? It would seem that the watch has no origin. It’s as if a djinn (a genie) simply zapped the watch into existance.
But I like the term “Bootstrap Paradox” much better 
Similar to the story by Heinlein called “By His Bootstraps”.
I think they* should just combine the Terminator and Matrix franchises into a single epic series, where the latter is merely a future in which the Terminator robots are successful in their time travelling endeavors, and thus wipe out almost all of the human resistance.
*They = the powers that be.
[jargonfiletrivia]
Which is the etymological ancestor of the verb “boot” when referring to turning on a computer, and “bootstrap code.”
[/jargonfiletrivia]
I like “Bootstrap Paradox” too. And, Diceman, you might want to read Robert Heinlein’s By His Bootstraps, which is almost certainly doc_miller’s inspiration for the name.