I mean, where the hell else can this story go?! What was Swarzenegger [sic? so sue me!] thinking?!
I mean, Eddie Furlong couldn’t be in it because he’s too coked up, Hamilton’s character is apparently dead. I can’t tell for 100% certainty, but I think James Cameron only HELPED write it, and didn’t direct or produce. I sense a huge dud in the making, and a very steep decline in Arnie’s career soon to follow.
Thoughts?
(And FTR, I’m really surprised no one else has posted a thread on this.)
Cameron didn’t have anything to do with this movie. He got sued over the first two and has refused to have anything to do with this movie because of it. (And yeah, there have been other threads on this.)
based on characters created by. That’s about all he has associated with this future bomb (especially if it is rated PG-13 like rumored! I want naked Terminatrix!!!)
I can’t understand either what in gods name inspired them to do this in such a half-ass way. I could have been into a proper T3 with the proper John etc, but if it ain’t got no “sara cawna” in it, then what can the point possibly be? This just screams “Hannibal” at me. Good gawd, looking at the trailer I just shudder, tv-movie-of-the-week stuff and Arnie look SO old! I mean he really looks old, really. I am so annoyed!
The first two films are amongst my favourites. Each was ground-breaking in it’s own way. I believe that T2 was probably the first movie I was actually “wound up” about, I was hyped for weeks before it was realeased.
Does anyone else seem to recall that in the original Terminator, the Terminators looked different from one another. The one that blew up the shelter didn’t look a damned thing like Arnold (aside from being a body builder and all). Would people watch another well-done Terminator sequel if it didn’t have Arnold in it (I’m just trying to think of a way to get around the fact that this “ageless machine” has gotten thirty damned near thirty years older).
IOf it makes him happy and it makes money, who cares?
BTW, you really can’t blame him for Batman and Robin. I mean, he did the best acting in that movie. Which is in itself rather disturbing, but had they gone the “campy, but fun” route of Batman 3 rather than the “moronic and dull” route of Batman 4, then he would have fit in perfectly.
Yeah, but the movies you list were interspersed with successful films. After Junior came Eraser, which wasn’t great but IIRC did pretty well at the box office. After LAH came True Lies. And I always thought Jingle did OK, considering it was a cheap movie to make (good return on investment for the studio).
So lately he’s been in decline; before that, he was a mixed bag. And before that he could do no wrong: between 1985’s Commando and 1991’s T2, only Red Heat was a bomb.
(I discount the earlier barbarian films and T1 because he wasn’t a star quantity yet – those were films that happened to have Arnold instead of being “Arnold films.”