Re: Bush’s choice of words
Tho I am not a scholar, there certainly are substantial commonalities between Christian and Muslim thought. The golden rule, love your neighbor, for example.
One problem with going to the Koran is, we did not know at the time (and still haven’t proven AFAIK), Muslim responsibility. Would have been awkward to, in essence, express understanding for someone doing something we didn’t know for sure that they did.
OTOH, it would have been an opportunity to express world unity by all sensible religions against such acts. Could have said all cultures abhor these acts, and all cultures provide succor in times of need. Might have emphasized our internal diversity as well as our membership in the world community, instead of boasting as the invincible America – you can knock us down but can’t knock us out.
Personally, I have many reasons for disliking Bush. One of which is his, and elements of his party’s, efforts supporting religion in terms of school prayer, vouchers, support for religious charitable organizations, etc.
So to me personally, in light of my philosophy and biases, his repeated mention of prayer and Bible quoting seemed exclusionary – of me at least – instead of inclusionary. I repeat, I saw him speak 3 different times. Each included at least one reference to God, two of the three more than one. And these were not lengthy remarks. In contrast, the excerpts I saw from Tony Blair had no such references, but were nevertheless eloquent and comforting. (I understand, however, that at other times TB did refer to God). Moreover, GWB COULD have found appropriate sentiments in nonreligious texts, such as historical or literary quotes, that may enjoy nearly as widespread familiarity as the Bible verse he chose.
His choice offended me, and I assume others (for example Mrs. D.) I suggest that he had available alternatives that would not have offended me, and would have been nearly, if not as, reassuring to Christians. Moreover, this was not some yahoo speaking off the cuff. Every word was carefully chosen by numerous writers and advisors.
My president and his team intentionaly and repeatedly chose words and phrases that any sentient being would realize had the potential to either offend or provide no comfort to a large number of people (admittedly, a tiny minority of this predominantly Christian nation). I don’t apologize for noticing that. He certainly was not going out of his way to be inclusive of me. I am sure you will all agree that you do not notice exclusionary actions/words so much unless you are the one being excluded.
Re: prayer and God
Having rejected a deity rather early in ife, perhaps I retain an “elementary school” aspect of my understanding of a deity. But to me, if a deity were all-powerful and all knowing, I find it reprehensible for him/her/it not to have crashed those planes into the Hudson, or caused those responsible to have been spontaneously aborted decades ago.
I guess I’m selfish because I have never appreciated sentiments like “he is in a better place.” Sorry, but I like my friends and family right where they are. In an existence that I’m pretty damn sure actually exists. Rather than some potential “other” existence which, I might really hope exists, but, no matter how strong my faith …
Every one of us is trying to find some meaning in these events. To come to an understanding of what it says about our species. To determine how or if we will change how we lead our lives. Trying to reconcile our yearning for revenge with our condemnation of the violence that the terrorists committed.
Personally, I do not see how one can obtain any guidance or comfort from chalking this up to an inexplicable plan of God. And, to me, if God is a jerk/trickster enough to allow this to happen, I would have to question what possible use my prayers would have.
Don’t you think a good portion of the believers on those planes and falling out of those buildings were praying their asses off? Were their prayers answered/acknowledged? By killing and disrupting entire families?
And how about the nuts you hear of who believe that their route to heaven lies in murdering Americans? What if they are, in fact, right in their view of God? Personally, I find more sanity in rejecting both, and all other, interpretations.