So long as they don’t actually deflate.
Here’s a pic of most of the guys saying they’re ugly.
(all bolding mine)
Is there any chance you could post a pic so we could not only judge who we’d rather wake up with, but also give you our honest criticism?
Enright3 and everyone else: please be sure that any links are safe for work. That is, if you’re looking at that picture at work and your boss walks by and sees that on your screen, it’s not a career-limited situation. Just because the nipples are covered doesn’t mean that picture is workplace safe. I’ve broken the link.
Please see Rules for Posting on Straight Dope Message Boards and Cafe Society - Forum Rules (Post #5.)
I want to thank Freudian Slit for starting this thread. I’d pretty much forgotten about these hotties, but in the past 24 hours I’ve looked at some great pictures. Yeah, I know, the very opposite of Slit’s intention, but I’m generally not up for the game of “Ha ha, someone’s ugly!” It’s fantastic when that backfires.
I am mildly pleased at the thought that one day, both of the Olsen twins will no longer be deemed newsworthy, and I will not have to see their raccoon-like, overly made-up faces on the front pages of celebrity mags as I go through the supermarket checkout aisle.
So I need to collect them now, in case the supply dries up?
Seconded. Not really my type, but I wouldn’t kick 'em outta bed. Another pic: http://www.justdesktopwallpapers.com/images/celebrities/olsentwins/olsen_twins_1280x1024.jpg
I have made a note to teleport you a couple of hookerbots this weekend.
Oh my. They are moving up on my list mighty fast.
Photoshop! :D;)
Compared to the others, this one looks fairly normal…
http://www.freakingnews.com/Christina-Aguilera-Pictures-66963.asp
Don’t you have a closet full of flying taloned monkies available to you? Please instruct them to rip out your tongue and chew off your fingers for making such an outrageous statement.
Yes, I know, no sexbot for me.
In the first place, the monkeys are, for obvious reasons, trained never to risk the slightest harm to me. They’d bite off their own fingers first.
In the second place, I already sent the hookerbot. Per your earlier statement, it has been configured to look like Billy Ray Cyrus.
There was a third place but I forgot what it was.
In the fourth place (and this is really directed at Lobsang, a deliberately mangled-by-photoshop picture does not change anything. I could photoshop a picture of myself so that I appear to have a 12-inch penis but that wouldn’t make it so.
I also forgot the fifth place. I really need to get a memo pad.
Finally, I am not saying that Hilton is Earth’s hottest women, or Earth’s hottest blonde, or Earth’s hottest dumb blonde party heiress. Obviously she isn’t. But she’s not bad looking, either.
Not bad looking if you think a space mantis is atractive.
Oh, yes, you did specify hookerbots, which means I have to put coins in their ‘slots’, which may be a problem given their intended use. However, I am not so desperate that I will pay to have sex with a Billy Ray Cyrusbot.
In the first place, Rhymer Industries hookerbots require no coins and are indistinguishable, on a tactile, visual, and olfactory level, from the persons they simulate.
In the second place, that statement seems in opposition to this
In the third place, obviously I was comping you the 'bots services.
I have, once again, forgotten the fourth place.