I bought a new computer recently and I’ve been setting it up.
I have MKV files and I needed a program that would play them. I downloaded and installed VLC media player.
It generally works. But I have some MKV files that it won’t play. I get a message that tells me “Missing codec” and “This item was encoded in a format that’s not supported.” Sometimes it will play the sound but not the picture.
Do I need a different version of VLC? Do I need a different player? What’s a codec and can I get one? Is there some way I can tell the difference between the MKV files this program will play and those it won’t?
MKV is just a container file, the actual content can be any video format (i.e. any video compression type). The codec is the software that actually does the video compression/decompression, which isn’t necessarily part of the playback software (i.e it is an external software called by the playback software). I think if you open the file in VLC and go to Tools -> Codec Information, it will tell you what codec the file uses.
src4 is entirely correct. However, it’s quite rare to find a codec that VLC can’t play, especially when it is in a modern container like MKV (so it’s unlikely to be some old, esoteric format).
Assuming you have the latest version of VLC (3.0.7.1 Velinari as of this post), I would actually suspect the files have been corrupted in such a way that VLC can’t detect the codec properly. If you have any way of verifying the files or downloading a new, clean copy, I’d try that.
Or, apparently, there is a rash of fake videos out there, where the actual video content is an error message saying that you need to install a codec. These will usually mention some sort of URL, which, if you follow them, may open you up to malware.
VLC does not use external codecs. It supports all of its codecs out of the box. That’s actually one of the defining features.
In addition to the VLC media/codec information window, running ffprobe in a terminal window will display technical info you can use to quickly diagnose such problems.
I’ve seen some mkvs recently with some weird H.264/AVC variant that makes my converters/editors go kablooey. But still VLC plays them.
One problem is that there’s always someone out there who does their own implementation of a codec or tries to “improve” things and incompatibility results.
Do you really need any of those just to play back, with VLC?
I can’t guarantee it will play 100% of files out of the box, but it will be interesting to discover which ones it can’t. Most legitimate files should decode smoothly.
I’ve always used the K-Lite codec pack and it comes with Media Player Classic as part of the pack. So far it plays everything unless I get a corrupted file. I only use VLC if a video stutters (hasn’t happened in a long time) but in general I really prefer MPC.
That CVE is overblown. The CVSS score is absolute nonsense. A score that high would indicate a situation where VLC could without any action by the user of the computer allow an attacker to take it over. That’s impossible in this case, as the user has to download a malicious video and open it with VLC. Furthermore, nobody has even demonstrated a working exploit of the vulnerability. It remains a theoretical vulnerability for the moment.
The bug was even fixed over a year ago. This makes itl a good example of why it’s important to keep your software up-to-date, especially if it ever interacts with the web or files that you’ve downloaded from the internet.
TL;DR: This was overhyped by the original finder of the vulnerability and the media, but definitely make sure that your VLC up-to-date.
BTW, if the files can be opened in MPC, it can tell you the codecs from a “properties” menu. Or you could try one of the programs listed on this page.
(Also, I realized why I thought I had been using MPC for so long–I remember that I used to always migrate the Windows Media Player that MPC is the “classic” of from one Windows version to the next even after Microsoft stopped supplying it–so I’ve been using something that looks like MPC since at least Windows 95, maybe even the Windows 3.1 version.)
(ETA: yep, been using the look since 1991)