[QUOTE=SherwoodAnderson]
RaleighRally, let’s for starters take note that a number of inaccuracies in your posts have been pointed out to you, and of you deciding on not addressing them but instead pursuing a tactic of evasion deeply, all of which hurts your credibility. What reason do we have really to spend precious time debating you when you have so far failed to demonstrate honesty and willingness to do your own homework?
[/QUOTE]
The thing is that you are not supposed to know about the truth behind political correctness, because it would then obviously be much harder to gain public support for this Marxist ideology. I gave you an excellent video so you can investigate this further.
[QUOTE=SherwoodAnderson]
You should take a hint from the fact that “Marxist” nations has been more prone to violate the GC and the UDHR than democratic capitalist nations.
[/QUOTE]
The USSR and its satellites only used the economic version of Marxism. But I think there was an unsuccessful attempt in Hungary to implement cultural Marxism, by Bela Kun. Béla Kun - Wikipedia
[QUOTE=SherwoodAnderson]
Since WWII, on only two occasions did a xenophobic (or in swedish “främlingsfientligt”) party make the 4% election threshold to the Swedish parliament: in 1991 when Ny Demokrati got ~6% and in 2010 when SverigeDemokraterna got ~6%. That shows in a rather neat way how marginalized RaleighRally’s political views are in his home country, since all the other political parties (representing 94% of the electorate at the times when xenophobic sentiments have been the strongest) have usually been quite vocal in ostracizing xenophobic movements and their leaders.
[/QUOTE]
Did you know that ALL major newspapers and TV channels in Sweden actively opposed the Sweden Democrats? On election day, both Aftonbladet and Expressen showed a big appeal on their front page urging the Swedes NOT to vote on SD. SD’s commercial was not allowed to be shown on TV. Not really a fair and democratic election. By the way, Arnold Antoni is not a member of parliament, but Michael Aastrup Jensen, a member of the Danish Parliament for the Liberal Party, says this:
“None of the established parties and none of the established media in Sweden like to discuss it because they feel like it is not politically correct,” said Jensen. “There is a ‘blanket’ drawn all over the Swedish media. This should be a wake-up call to all the other parties.” http://rt.com/politics/swedish-elections-immigration-controversy/
[QUOTE=SherwoodAnderson]
Crucially you have yet to acknowledge that it has already been established that Swedish immigration policy is historically an artifact of the western liberal democratic tradition rather than a marxist one, thus rendering your original point invalid.
[/QUOTE]
Combining generous welfare and nearly open borders is not a liberal tradition.
[QUOTE=SherwoodAnderson]
Yes, cherrypicking a quote out of context from a guy who was the Prime Minister of Sweden for 23 years and a public figure even longer is a meaningful exercize. Not.
[/QUOTE]
Can you find ANY context in which his statement would NOT be considered racist by today’s standards? Isn’t it a bit strange that this “old artifact of the western liberal democratic tradition” was so abruptly shifted in less than a decade?