He’s been caught so many times before but the misleading ad and his in person speaking claiming Chrysler was planning to move Jeep production to China may be the last straw.
http://blog.chryslerllc.com/blog.do?id=1932&p=entry
Romney lies:
He’s been caught so many times before but the misleading ad and his in person speaking claiming Chrysler was planning to move Jeep production to China may be the last straw.
http://blog.chryslerllc.com/blog.do?id=1932&p=entry
Romney lies:
It hasn’t so far, has it?
Well, Romney is a lying sack, but are we really gonna take Chrysler’s word for anything when they say they ain’t ship jobs overseas?
I mean, Romney could be lying, but he also could just be speaking out of turn.
How do we know he’s lying? Are you going to believe the Chrysler people? I think that there could be a very good possibility that he is telling the truth. He is going to win by a landslide so I guess the point is moot.
I think Chrysler’s recent investments in its Ohio Jeep plants speak a lot louder than anything else. I can’t see this doing anything but destroying his chances in Ohio. What a lying little piece of shit.
His lips are moving?
And to answer the OP’s question: no, getting caught in [another] lie won’t hurt his chances. As long as he stays white and republican, it doesn’t really matter what his actual positions are (or were, or what they’ll be in the future).
How would Romney know what Chrysler is going to do?
Win by a landslide? I’m skeptical.
Be that as it may, and Romney may be making a statement as true as the day is long, but I would imagine the people who work for Chrysler/Jeep in Ohio, and their family and friends, in a battle of he-said-it-said, would have a tendency to believe Chrysler/Jeep rather than an opportunistic politician in the final weeks before election day. Especially since Jeep just invested a half-million in its Toledo plant, and over a billion elsewhere in the U.S..
That audio clip leaves off a critical piece of what he said. What he said was:
*“I saw a story today that one of the great manufacturers in this state, Jeep—now owned by the Italians — is thinking of moving all production to China,”
*
It’s true that there have been stories published about this. They were either wrong or misleading about what was actually happening. And note that he said they were “thinking” of doing this, not that they were going to do it.
You might be able to catch Romney in a lie, but not this time.
There is no evidence that Chrysler was thinking about it. To the contrary, Chrysler has made significant investments in its Ohio plant. He’s running to be president, not editor of the National Fucking Enquirer. If he reads somewhere that Russia is thinking about launching a missile, is he going to do a pre-emptive launch? Is there anything Romney could say that you wouldn’t give him a pass on?
Here’s the Bloomberg story that probably started this rumor:
So is being economical with the truth a lie or not?
Are you kidding, he has been busted on that ‘Obama has eliminated the work requirement for welfare’ canard time and again and that crap was in an ad on Pandora 5 minutes ago.
They’re also considering moving production from the US to Italy. And yes, they are considering moving production out of the US, and then importing the cars back to the US for sale. This article is a re-hash of a story that broke a week or two ago. I even started a thread about it, and was shouted down by Dopers who assured me that it makes no sense for Fiat to do such a thing. Except that, apparently, it does.
Lying his ass off has not hurt him at all so far and it helped him tremendously in the first debate, why would anyone think this is going to be any different?
The Obama campaign is out w/ an ad pushing back on Romney’s claims, and straight-up use the “L” word. Is this the first time they’ve used the word Lie in one of their official ads?
Hmm. Seems to me that ad is a lie, since Romney didn’t say what it claims he said.
I have to admit the title of this thread made me chuckle. If lying in political ads had a negative impact with voters I think we’d have noticed by now.
And even by the standards of political lies this is a rather tame one, in that it’s obviously misleading but you could plausibly read the text in a way that’s not false.
Please explain which part of the ad you feel is a lie.