Windows Media Center vs. Windows XP Pro

I’m in the market for a new computer. I want to get one with XP Pro, as I plan on creating a peer-to-peer network with my current machine, something not supported with XP Home.

So, about a week ago, I walked into a CompUSA and looked at some models. Lo and behold, I see that some of them come with a new OS called “Windows Media Center 2005.” From the name and the design of the machines that it was installed on, it’s fairly obvious that the OS is designed for those who will be working with audio/video files. I liked the look of the machne and it’s capabilities, but not knowing anything about the OS, I figured I’d ask a few questions.

So, I called over a salesperson. I asked him if the machine I wanted was available with XP Pro instead of Media Center. He informed me that Media Center had all of XP Pro’s features (plus better handling of multimedia content, of course).

Fast forward to now. I’m looking at some machines on Dell’s website and I see that WMC is actually less money than XP Pro. That raises a red flag in my head… if WMC is better, why is it cheaper than Pro?

So, what’s the Straight Dope? Does WMC have all the features of Pro? Or is it weaker in certain key areas?

Zev Steinhardt

http://www.microsoft.com/WindowsXP/mediacenter/evaluation/compare.mspx

XP Pro is more designed for business users. Windows XP Media Center Edition is a variant on the XP home edition.

I have a WMC system. When installing the OS it states please insert the windows XP Pro#2 CD (it is a 2 cd OS), so I guess that it is atleast a version of windows XP Prof. WMC is actually designed to alllow a PC to act as a tivo, providing TV, DVD, Radio, and Pictures. I dont believe that the system would be apropriate for professional use.

On a side note, I dont see why win XP home would not work for a P2P network…the drivers to support one are in Win xp…I’ve done it before. just a network hub, some cat 5 cable, and each computer with the same workgroup, it worked well.

XP Home doesn’t support domain type networks, but ordinary peer-to-peer networks are fine.