That’s been resolved too. Can I interest you in some brine?
What if your pets are Sea Monkeys?
:rolleyes: Nice job, tardling. Next time, finish the thread before replying. Because we resolved this issue, and as it turns out, that’s not what PinkMarabou meant at all. If you want to participate in a thread, come when the debate’s still happening. There’s no point in you trying to have a debate with a position that no one took.
No one, Gracie? 
Who said they’d be willing to murder for their pets? PinkMarabou was talking about killing a dog - the rest was a mixture of misinterpretation and hyperbole.
Misinterpretation and Hyperbole – the very mascots of this thread. Who’ll ever forget them?
Man, it still has nothing on me and catsix arguing about circumcision a while back.
Please don’t beat this horse back to life asscake.
And just for this, you get a special treat just from me . . . :wally
Oh, blah blah. Someone did take, whether it was hyperbole or not, it’s what was said–if not, I’d say you’re the “tardling” for arguing it for six pages. Genius.
That said, yeah, I should’ve read to the end and I look like a chump now. Whoopeee. Apologies to PinkMarabou.
Yeah, see, I argued it because PinkMarabou hadn’t clarified what she meant yet.* Plus, arguing’s fun. You argued it even though PinkMarabou had already made herself perfectly clear. You just didn’t bother to find out. And why didn’t you do that? I’m guessing drug-induced brain damage, but I’m withholding judgment till I’m sure.
Have a pleasant evening, dear. 
Oh, come off it. You said I argued a position that “no on took”. Someone, actually, did take it-- they changed it later. What you said was not accurate.
And, like I said, I’m the doofus for not reading to the end. Whoopee, again. Dumb thing that everyone does at least once.
(Drug-induced, but not brain damage–out sick and medicated…)
Yeah, but that’s a market value, isn’t it? Is anyone suggesting that this woman would have gotten $45,000 for her dog if she had attempted to sell it? The “value” attached to this ruling comes from “the emotional value” she had invested in the dog, not the market value.
Apples and oranges.
or something
And the dog owner’s uncaring attitude that his dog chew up the entire neighborhood.
It was hyperbole . . . mixed in with traumatic childhood experiences and some raging PMS I might add. Things got carried away, I have since apologized and so has Excalibre.
Apology accepted. Just let this thread die they way it should have days ago . . .
No, you shut up!
[Clark Gable]
Chalk up one for your side.
[/Clark Gable]
[Ferris Bueller] You’re still here? Its over… Go home. [/Ferris Bueller]
Dang it, I should have known better with a 7 page thread! Okay, ready for tarring and feathering.
No . . . YOU shut up! Meanie-Pants!
:: throws bits of paper at PinkMarabou while the teacher isn’t looking ::