I have reached my one year anniversary at this mistake which I call a job. I am currently interviewing at other firms in town, but my hatred of this place, my resentment and annimosity has pretty much overtaken reason.
In my division, we have one major client. Internal politics of this miserable place being what they are, two people have positioned themselves as the representatives of the group. They meet with the clients, and pass the word to us. Usually this wouldn’t bother me, but they are really not the most qualified for the job. They are not the most intelligent, don’t really know all the questions to ask, and are not the most articulate. The beauty for them is, that they have convinced the big boss that our client is a particularly delicate individual, and that he should be treated as a child “you don’t want to overwhelm him with too many diferent people”, never mind the fact that most of the rest of the team has worked with this particular client before, and we know what he’s really like. So they have secured themselves a job as client relations, keepers of information, all upcoming jobs are being filtered through them.
So, on to my question. Among all the reasons of why this person is a delicate person, the fact that he was a “good old boy”, kind of a racist, has flippantly come up. In my review, should I, as a latin male, bring up the fact that I’m bothered by this statement. Does this mean I’ll forever be in the background? Keep in mind that there is still a chance I’ll hang around here for a bit.