The previous one was even worse. Is it a phantom-y menace, or a literal menacing phantom, or an illusionary menace? Even after having watched the film (many years on now) I still have no idea. I hate lamely vague ambiguous titles. [Have the same issue with The Phantom Creeps; just a lone sneaky phantom, or a bunch of insubstantial creeps?]
How about The Adventures of Captain Africa? So named because, after they began filming, they discovered that they had lost the rights to use the Phantom character.
As an aside, my dad used to work for the movie companies (many of them). He got me an advertisement for “Revenge of the Jedi.” It was printed on heavy paper and unfolded to quite a size. Really nice, professional stuff. Then they changed the name of the movie to “Return of the Jedi” because they felt Jedi were not vengeful.
Of course, teenage me didn’t treat it with the respect it deserved and it was lost long ago. Might have been worth something today as a collector’s item (dunno, I never checked).
Considering that the few items (action figures etc) that made it to production are indeed highly sought after and worth considerably more than their Return versions, it’s a safe bet.
I Still Know What You Did Last Summer. As Roger Ebert pointed out, it takes place a year after the first film and thus should have been called I Still Know What You Did the Summer Before Last.
Ya gotta give the Sharknado franchise credit for steering into the skid with bad sequel titles.
Sharknado 2: The Second One
Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No!
Sharknado 4: The 4th Awakens
Sharknado 5: Global Swarming
Sharknado: Heart of Sharkness
Sharknado: Feeding Frenzy
Sharknado vs. Leprechaun
The Last Sharknado: It’s About Time