First of all, let me state that “I don’t need an answer fast”. Just wonderin’, is all.
I’m thinking of a “serial killer” scenario. The guy enjoys killing people for fun and profit – gotta have a hobby, right? He is also an amateur herpetologist with a giant snake as a pet. Let’s say that he has somehow acquired that elusive “30-foot-plus” snake that cryptozoologists have dreamed about all these years. A thirty-seven foot behemoth anaconda, easily capable of swallowing the heftiest man alive.
My question is – Is this a good way of disposing of the evidence? I’ve heard that snakes have very powerful digestive juices. Would there be much left over in the enormous eunectes’ excrement?
My understanding is that snakes like this have a really slow digestive system. So if you feed a corpse to a snake, the remains are going to be inside the snake for a couple of weeks. Pretty awkward if the police show up to your house during that time as part of the murder investigation and notice the bulge in your snake’s mid-section. All they need is a warrant and a veterinarian to recover the evidence.
Also, some snakes won’t eat a animal they didn’t kill themselves. So you can’t feed them a corpse.
On the plus side, while smaller snakes don’t digest bones, large pythons digest everything in a body.
Hi, I took care of a Rainbow Boa for three years and my experiences would seem to say no to that idea. The snake was a picky eater and the owner was able to get the snake to eat frozen rats that were “warmed” in warm water after thawing in the refrigerator. The owner would hold the warmed rat by the tail and jiggle the rat in front of the supposedly hungry snake - three weeks since last feeding. The snake would either strike and consume the rat or not.
I resorted to feeding the snake live, medium, rats as I couldn’t get the snake to take the dead rat.
I can’t imagine a snake consuming a dead hunk of human.
Apparently, anything else marks you as an amateur.
Also, if you need to bury a body, don’t bury it flat. Everybody will know that’s a body. Dig a hole vertically, like you were going to put a post in there. For good measure, drop a dead dog on top of it, to fool the cadaver dogs.
The things you learn, being a mystery and heist fan.
As stated, they take forever to digest someone. You’d need a farm of pythons if you’re a discerning serial killer. A bunch of pigs are cheaper and raise fewer questions when buying.
Depends on the snake. Some don’t hesitate around dead pinkies, and some don’t eat live prey (or end up becoming food themselves!). Going along with their slow digestive system, snakes don’t eat as often as mammals, and go go days between meals.
They stuff their prey underwater and let it decay for a few days, to make it easier to eat. That means it’s still around & discoverable evidence for the cops all that time.
All ectotherms ( including sharks ) have the same problem of slow digestion times. It makes for a fairly efficient critter in that one big meal lasts a good long time. But from a criminal standpoint not so great as evidence lingers.
The suggestion of hyenas on the other hand, specifically the Spotted Hyena, has some real merit. Fastish mammalian metabolism, super-strong jaws to grind up any and all bones and a super-efficient digestive system to reduce everything to powder, long lives, easily maintained in captivity. Probably even better than pigs. Also have been known to be reasonably sociable with human handlers ;).
Yah, makes sense regarding gators and crocs. I was going to suggest a school of piranha, but again one would be left with evidence (bones, teeth) laying around.
Of course, you could have the piranha do part of the job, then feed the bones to the gators.
I don’t fully understand the speed of digestion complaints. I think the average serial killer can pace herself well enough to let the snake finish each body.
And you could pass the bulge of as whatever its legitimate food is. I think it would be hard to get a warrant to examine the stomach contents of a live animal.
Yeah, and if there actually was a snake that big (37 foot anaconda), a regular-size human wouldn’t be that big of a meal, I’m thinking. I was aware of the slow-digesting metabolism of such an ectotherm – I’m thinking if the killer only struck three or four times a year, it wouldn’t be so much of a big deal for the snake.
By amazing coincidence, I was just reading this really good book about deadly animals, and it seems that snakes that swallow large prey don’t seem to be very good at estimating what is a reasonable size they can engulf and wind up leaving rather than dining - or else they give up on something they killed for unknown reasons.
Maybe one’s snake if really hungry might prefer live wriggling prey like its owner.
