Would cloned cats have the same color pattern?

I’ve got a black and white cat that’s not striped, pointed, or tuxedo. His patterning doesn’t match any breed I’ve seen, and doesn’t look like one somebody would try to breed for (mostly black on top and tail, white on bottom, with some crossover at either end (has a white collar and a black “codpiece”).

So, if I cloned him somehow, would the clone have that same color pattern, or would it be some different arrangement of black and white? Are feline color patterns purely genetic, or are they more like human fingerprints?

I got him from a shelter so I have no idea what his littermates looked like.

They have cloned a cat, and it was completely different, not even the same colour, as its donor.

<off-topic>
See the Medlej Guide to cat coat colors/patterns – a very complete & detailed guide.

(Based on that, your cat would probably be described as:[ul]
[li]base color black, []no tortiseshell pattern, []no tabby pattern, []no colorpoint pattern, []whitespotted about grade 4 (just less than ‘tuxedo’), [*]no tipped shade.[/ul][/li]
And you have a very interesting question; I hope someone has an answer.

Are litters of cats (is that right term) identical siblings in terms of DNA?

Nope just standard siblings. Only armadillos have identical siblings in each litter.

ETA: Cats being what they are, the members of the litter are often only half siblings.

Definitely not!
Female cats are superfecund. Meaning that a litter of kittens born at the same time may be from different tom cats, breeding the female at different times within her roughly week-long heat period. Or from the same tom cat, mating with the female multiple times during that heat.

Coat colour/patterns are set by environmental factors as well as genetics. Identical twin calves can have different coat patterns and ear shapes. Cloned animals have different coats as well.

From the FDA

Si

That cat at the bottom is the surrogate, not the donor. The cat at the top left is the donor, and looks a lot like the kitten.

The first is a calico, and the kitten isn’t. Though poorly annotated the article answers the very question asked in the OP.

I did not know that!

I know that the coat pattern is affected by something called Lyonization, where one or the other X-chromosome is suppressed - this happens early on in development, resulting in varying gene expression through the body. Because of this, if the color genes are on the X chromosome, it would be incredibly unlikely that a clone would end up with the same pattern.

Ok cool.

Ah, but do cloned cats have nine lives, or fewer based upon how many lives the donor has already used?

This is the cause of the calico coat pattern. I don’t believe that other coat color genes are located on the X chromosome, though I’m not a cat genetics person.

You know, that’s one thing I love about this board: even a simple binary (yes/no) question leads to a wealth of interesting information.

From my initial googling on the issue I was under the (erroneous) impression that breed-defining patterns (calico, tortoiseshell, points, etc.) would match in a clone. But, apparently cat beauty contests are just as arbitrary as human ones.

Black on top and white below? Sounds like a penguin.

Or it could describe various website visuals that are NSFW.

I thought this was a fascinating book…

The cloned kitten as an adult. I think the differences from the donor are more obvious in this photo.

To nitpick, it’s the cause of the tortoiseshell pattern (mixture of red and black), calico being a combination of white and tortoiseshell. The gene for red color is on the X-chromosome. I believe black is autosomal.

So did Liam Lynch get hoodwinked? His cat Finnegan Forcefield appears to be a carbon copy of the donor, and all of Lynch’s commentary on the project seems sincere. I never got the impression that it was a publicity stunt. At least not on his part, but maybe Genetic Savings and Clone fooled him for their own PR purposes.