Bwahahahaha!
If you are going to be picky why would you start sentences with And?
In fact, why didn’t you use a comma and make it one sentence.
If this sounds faggy and petty it’s because playing your bs games is.
I’ll help you along: Can you start a sentence with And? - Answers
Isn’t about time you switch accounts?
Here’s a few more cites, just in case one isn’t enough.
Oooh, I know a big nasty silly who deserves a good slap!
Do you really think independent voters share your low opinion of unions?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-02-24-wisconsinpoll24_ST_N.htm
Frankly, I hope Walker sticks to his guns. The opposition is growing fast, and even Republicans are thinking twice. Republicans have a hard time anticipating unintended consequences, which will make it all the more delicious when this blows up in Walker’s face.
Anybody wanna point out how Lobohan was whooshed by that ‘corpse’ and ‘57 states’ post?
I thought not. 
This is really meta. Didn’t I respond about Obama having misstatements… Did you just recursive-woosh yourself?
Um, Lobo wasn’t wooshed.
Yeah, but you clearly bit on his intentional mistakes vis-a-vis ‘corpse’ and ‘57 states’.
How many people would be in favor of a huge corporation making large contributions to influence representatives who would then use their legislative power to enrich that corporation in later negotiations with the government?
When is buying a legislator acceptable?
Whose intentional mistakes, Starkers?
I was referring to the errors pointed out in Frank’s Post.
Do I get extra points for a triple-woosh score?
By quoting intentional mistakes from Assi’s subsequent post?
I don’t think so. (Triple-whoosh score, that is.)
What does this have to do with grammar or spelling?
Your points have nothing to do with grammar or spelling. It’s just that certain people around here coughFrankcoughLobohancough will try to seize upon minor errors like that and pretend that they completely undercut your point. Along with specious cite demands, that is one of the more prevalent types of intellectual dishonesty that goes on around here.
Absolutely nothing.
It was merely an attempt to comment on the actual thread topic.
I didn’t mean to disrupt the meaningless catfight over grammar and spelling.
My apologies, do continue.
Allow me to say this slowly, because you’re old and were not quick when young:
[ol]
[li]Assi makes mistakes.[/li][li]Frank points out mistakes.[/li][li]Assi talks about Obama to defend himself from Frank.[/li][li]Lobohan quotes Assi’s defense, noting that Obama has made 2, while Assi made 6 in one post.[/li][li]Starving Artist thinks Lobohan doesn’t recognize that the Assi Post is about Obama, even though Lobohan mentions it in his post. Further he thinks that the six mistakes Lobohan mentions are the two from Assi’s quoted post.[/li][li]Lobohan tells SA that he’s wrong and even links the post he’s talking about, with the six mistakes.[/li][li]Starving Artist is actually so fucking stupid, he still doesn’t understand what’s going on and still thinks the post was about Assi’s Obama snark.[/li][li]Lobohan makes a helpful list, because as a 21st century conservative, Starving Artist is roughly as smart as a mid-range chicken.[/li][/ol]
Too bad there were not many examples of debate on the post besides all this crap. It was mostly a bunch of chimps throwing their own shit at each other.
Nice post, UncaThomas. I was just pointing out the absurdity.
I’ve gathered as much.