Oh you want to debate? Well suit up shitheel. Let’s see your game face.
- Lobohan is a dolt who can rarely utter a post without calling his adversary stupid or a moron.
- Assi fucked up a couple times in his grammar and spelling.
- Frank seized upon this not only to belittle Assi’s post but apparently to posit also that Assi is of the belief that Obama has only made two mistakes while president.
- Assi responds with quasi-humorous post with intentional misspellings.
- Lobodolt quotes that post while making fun of Assi once again.
- SA bwahahaha’s.
- Crickets
- SA asks why crickets?
- Lobodolt makes lame excuse pretending to have been responding to a different post than the one he quoted/cited in that response.
- SA says ‘sorry, no dice’.
- Lacking adequate defense, Lobodolt predictablly calls SA stupid.
- Contraction of ‘we are’ takes an apostrophe.
Whoosh!!
Are you really such a coward that you refuse to face reality when spelled out? Really?
He obviously never visited this place.
And yet the example I used was done by actual liberals. Did they do it for the benefit of anyone but themselves?
People in power want to stay in power and don’t like it when they lose it or are losing it. They’ll make deals with the devil or do what they think it takes to keep it or gain it. It doesn’t matter if they are liberal or conservative. Yeah, keep your ideals about how your way is better and it is the other side that has something wrong with them. It’s a lie, but you don’t care.
Just to clarify things a bit: The Liberal Party of Canada has nothing to do with the reference to “liberal” in the US. Any more than a reference to conservatives in the US would in some way relate to Harper and his Conservative Party.
You stated that you like Bobby Jindal. You can’t spell his name, you’re not certain that he’s old enough, you can’t spell the name of the state he’s governor of. All in one sentence. Clearly you are arguing from a position of knowledge.
Then you throw in the birth certificate nonsense (which explains Starving Artist oozing to your defense–he never met a birther he didn’t like), and lastly, people who don’t put the period of sentences that are inside parentheses inside the fucking parentheses get on my last nerve.
First of all, I came to no one’s defense; I merely pointed to your intellectually dishonest tactic of trying to discredit someone’s argument because he misspelled a couple of words.
Secondly, I’d like to see a cite where I’ve ever expressed any opinion one way or another in support of birthers. And the thread where, in response to birther issues raised by CoT I asked a few questions based on information gleaned from the MSM, doesn’t count because even there I never said anything that could remotely be construed as favoritism toward birthers. In fact I stated out loud and bluntly that I’ve never been a birther, am not a birther, and will never be a birther. And yet here you are lying through your teeth, claiming I never met a birther I didn’t like.
And thirdly, in that thread you proudly stated that you had always regarded me as liar (an accusation that you’d never be able to prove, btw, unless you can point to a single lie I’ve told anywhere in my 10,000+ posts), and yet here you are demonstrably lying through your own teeth.
Can you say “Hoist on my own petard?”
Yeah, I thought that you could.
You’re a lying sack of shit Frank. To echo Christopher Hitchens’ assessment of Jerry Falwell, if someone were to knock all the shit out of you, you could be buried in a matchbox.
Putz!
Ohh, Ohh, ohh, I wanna try the answer to that!
How about when it is a union making “… making large contributions to influence representatives who would then use their legislative power to enrich that corporation in later negotiations with the government?”
Is that when buying a legislator is acceptable?
Did I get it right?
Can you say “Hoist on my own petard?”
CMC fnord!
And would be considered to be to the ‘left’ of the Democratic party on the political spectrum.
I don’t support the liberal party of Canada either. The move they did back then was disgusting. The fact you think it’s just “business as usual”, makes you disgusting too.
You’re starting to slip into NDP crackpot territory then which pretty much means your batshit insane and reality is only something that marginally concerns you. No point in continuing this conversation then.
Lot’s of “Batshit insane” folks in Canada then. Sorry that thought frightens you off.
Enjoy your lack of ethics.
Harper is also considered ‘left’ of the Democratic Party, just to keep things in perspective. Point being that your references to what the Martin government did aren’t relevent to the discussion.
You lied in thisthread that you started, and this one too. What’s worse is that you’ll even pass off other people’s lies as your own.
Completely relevant for a number of reasons, 1. The term ‘real’ liberals was brought up; and 2. Conservatives are the corrupt ones. Martin proves that ‘real’ liberals are as corrupt as anyone else.
Boy, you got us there! Liberals are people, ain’t no getting around that one! Not an angel in the bunch, nosir!
While you seem to prove that conservatives believe that if you’re not corrupt (and pay off politicians for their votes) then you are stupid, because “everyone does it”.
(And what happened to Martin’s government at the next election? It seems that it did not pay off. Seems the voters do not like it when you convince an opposition member to switch sides. You could learn a lesson here.)