IMHO, an app for tracking how much time you spend looking at the screen is sort of like methadone: if you’re using it you’re not really kicking the habit.
This one reminds me of my days as a prof reviewing papers for journals.
I’d find a flaw (many times quite obvious) in an algorithm. Recommend the paper be rejected. The authors would oftentimes respond “But I have a 35 page proof that the algorithm is correct! If you can’t find the flaw in the proof, then you are wrong.”
“Nope, see where the algorithm goes wrong in this simple situation. End of discussion.”
Some people didn’t get it. One was one of the founders of formal program proofs. Pulled the same stunt. Was also the editor of the journal (which is actually a conflict of interest) so it was just little ol’ me against this Big Shot. But the algorithm fell apart in two different ways. (Turned out that the proof was how the author thought it worked vs. how it was actually written down.)
[sarc] Thanks, [/sarc] Lumpy. I just spent half an hour catching up on XKCD.
I loved Cell Phone Functions, but I can’t believe Randall didn’t at least try to put actual dates on the X axis.
Anyone here want to try?
And add any other functions they used to use a standalone device for. I’ve got a few old Popular Mechanics magazines and came across a Radio Shack ad, where every device on the (very crowded) page was included in my phone.
Too much time travel and you usually end up with an infinite regression of people clasping their predecessor on the shoulder and announcing they’re from Scotland Yard.
I don’t think so; it just takes movie titles (or a few classic fan arguments) that have “versus” in them, and imagines them as a NCAA-basketball-type bracket. Not that I wouldn’t like to see Scott Pilgrim versus Batman…
I wouldn’t be surprised if half the captchas are there to help crack the other half. The AI Apocalypse won’t be Skynet, it’ll be the first intelligent spam bot.