Too late. Mom turned me over any untold number of times to, um, clean my tush.
… thus undoing all the good done here …
Great! I can see the anti-daylight savings time people organizing a mass spin–in; until they get so dizzy they fall off the edge.
I’m getting flashbacks of metric tensors from hell.
I’m sorry Randall, but that’s just mean. 
It’s a joke, but actually it would be good to cite what spelling standard and what style guide are being used in a work.
And to be very transparent, also cite the font and type foundry, the paragraph and line formats, the page size and margin selections.
We really shouldn’t be taking implicit credit for the creative choices of others.
As long as you use Word’s built-in templates, you can take it for granted that there were never any creative choices involved in the first place.
Interesting that that strip is a 2x2 grid. The various “theories” had be be in the order they were in for optimal humour but if 2 and 4 were switched, the table would have a more pleasing layout with a horizontal space/break room axis and a vertical astrophysical object/microwave oven axis.
Just another example of Canadian pushiness.
I’m confused. If it’s rebounding it should be getting farther from the center of the Earth and therefore growing not shrinking.
I wonder what Randall knows that I don’t? At least about this topic; there are way too many other topics where Randall knows and I don’t.
Maybe the rebound is greater north OF Minnesota, pushing its northern boundary southwards.
I believe that is the case. Also, the area south of where the Ice Age glaciers were is rebounding downward. About half of Minnesota was not covered in glaciers, so it’s part of that downward rebound.
Aha! So the actual shrinkage of Minnesota is up in the air.
For those wondering about how long that 0.016-mile difference is, it’s 1.28 chains.