But that fucker keeps pissing me off.
The last sentence is really cool. Take a look:
I’m sorry Real Americans[sup]TM[/sup], I’ll try not to usurp your power too stridently with my brown skin of awesomeness. Please don’t shoot me down in the street.
And yet you seem to have felt compelled to read one of his articles.
I suggest that YOU know he’s right AND you’re wracked WITH guilt and FURTHERMORE I interpret your “APPARENTLY” sarcastic comment AS a genuine INVITATION to do exactly that.
Of course, by “Traditional Americans”, he means the Native Americans, doesn’t he? You know, the guys that were living in North American before all those white guys came across and destroyed their nation.
You sounds like an Oath Keeper to me.
I’d have more insights to share, but I’ll be busy planting my Full Acre Crisis Garden.
Especially as your ancestors probably arrived in the country centuries before his.
I think we need to invent a drinking game based on Raving Right catch phrases:
“Real Americans” or “Traditional Americans” - drink
“Media Elite” drink twice
“Middle America” drink
“Second Amendment” drink
“Defend the Constitution” chug
“Obama” or " Clinton" or “Kennedy” drink for each; if all three then chug
feel free to add some more
Don’t you get it? By “traditional Americans” he means “white male racists” are losing Amerca.
Pat is right about that. The crazy part is that he thinks this is bad, when it’s actually good.
I can’t believe no one mentioned that Pat Bucanan’s last sentence is actually 3 sentences.
It’s true. Brown people are too dumb to count to three.
Pat Buchanan serves one purpose and one purpose only: to prove that Jews do not control the media.
His autobiography is set in Washington D.C. in the pre-civil rights era. It just drips with sentiment about how the happy darkies didn’t want rights at all nosiree bob and women were just happy to be in the kitchen all day cooking up good meals for the menfolk.
This guy got it right.
I thought that was what Rupert Murdoch was for.
You know, if I told you I had read an essay where the opening statement was
and then asked you to tell me where in the political spectrum the author lay and what you believed the thesis of the essay would be, I don’t think one person in twenty would get it right.
He’s taken it one step further since then. Rooting for the poor, oppressed White majority to get ready with their guns. If I saw that bigoted bastard walking down the street, I’d be another minority statistic sitting in a jail cell because I don’t know if I could restrain myself from cockpunching the assclown.
I mean, it’s not like I’m white and good and real or anything. He’d be expecting that, right?
Well, presumably he won’t press charges 'cause he’ll want to be on your good side now that you’re taking over.
The funny thing about organizations like the “Oath Keepers” is their apparently unwillingness to realize that in a revolution (civil war) there wouldn’t be one faction of revolutionaries there would be about 1000.
The Oath Keepers are funny.
I almost hope the government does try some of that stuff, just so we can laugh at the oath keepers when they band together to express their outrage by blogging about it.
It’s also funny that in Buchanan’s screed he talks about rising crime. The idea of rising crime is a funny one, even though crime has been steadily DECREASING for my entire life most people consider it axiomatic that it’s rising.
“Death panels” take a drink
“Tea party” take a drink
“Long form birth certificate,” take a drink
“Communist,” “Socialist” or “Nazi” take a drink. If all three adjectives are used to describe the same person, chug.
I think y’all have missed the point of this game. If we played by your rules we’d just need to attach an IV. The point is to pick a commonly held buzzword or two so that you drink regularly but not so common that you cannot take a breath.
“Patriot”, drink.